Retrial against FFC leader Agim Ademi again charged with obligation

Because of the failure of this session was the absence of prosecutor and injuryist Dritaro Cadoll, reports “Justice Trust”.

Regarding the prosecutor's absence of the case of Sabit Sadij, the prosecutor in the case stated that for the same court there is evidence that he has been regularly invited, while for that he will inform the chief prosecutor.

On the other hand, because of the absence of the injured Kadolli Judge Sadikuj said that according to the tract returned to court, it turns out the same is found in London until May 15th this year, which information according to this leaflet reportedly was made after telephone communication.

Even the October 7, 2021, scheduled session had failed to be held because of the absence of the injured Cardolli.

Since conditions for holding this same session were not met, the next one was assigned September 7, 2022.

The subject at first when it was returned to the retrial has been tried in the Department of War Crimes by Judge Medie Bytyqi, the latter for the “Justice Vow” has also confirmed that this subject has already passed the General Department.

An attempt to start the retrial had been made on March 24, 2021, when a hearing was scheduled for the case, but that session had failed to be held due to a lack of indictees.

However, because the criminal act of influence was presigned, which had also been declared a refusal act in July 2019, the subject has now been passed to the General Department of the Constitutional Court in Pristina.

There is more than a year of the Supreme decision when this subject had turned into retrial, but no retrial hearing was held against Adam and Rama until now.

Otherwise, the indictment against Rama and Adam was established on January 14, 2014, by the prosecutor EULEX, Maarten Groothuisen and Pristina Foundation Prosecutor's Prosecutor, Ilaz Beqiri.

According to the first point of the indictment, Ademi and Rama are charged that during the period of July 12th, September 12, 2012, with the aim of material gain, had threatened and attacked victim Dritro Kadolli, forcing the same to commit actions at the expense of his property, respectively, to make an unfair profit in the amount of 30,000 euros, or a car called “BUCH X5”

This vehicle, according to the prosecution, was then claimed to be handed over to Sami Hamit, former head of the Pristina Municipal Assembly, performing the criminal offence in co-ordination.

Meanwhile, at the second point of the indictment, Adam and Rama were accused of exercising influence in co-ordination.

According to the indictment, the two indictees had demanded from the injured Kadolli the promise of unjust profit -- the amount of 30,000 euros, or type car “, respectively. SINCE X5”, looking for the exercise of their improper influence in decision-making an official person who in this case was the former head of the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, Sami Hamiti, to change the status of a plot of land from the green-green” to the “construction area”.

The Constitutional Court in Pristina, on July 5, 2019, had convicted Ademi and Rama of the attempted criminal offence.

Ademi was sentenced by the first rate to nine months in effective prison, while Rama was sentenced to an effective year in prison.

In these sentences, the accused had been decided to be even counted as the time spent in detention from 12 September to 2 November 2012. For the criminal work of exercising influence, however, there had been a declaration of rejection because of the prescribing of this work.

By February 2020, the Court of Appeals had rejected the accused's complaints and had passed the sentences imposed by the first degree.

Disgusted with such judgments, however, the defenders of the accused had turned to him on request for protection of the Supreme Court's legality.

In this regard, the Supreme Court in July 2020 has decided to approve the same as based on the same, and the subject has turned it into retrial to the first degree.

The Supreme Court's “Colegy, placing in terms of a demand for protection of the legality of M.R. convicted defender. Lawyer R.K., and convicted A.A., filed against the formal form of the Court in Pristina, the Department of Criminals, PKR.n.51/2014 of July 5, 2019, at the college session held on July 15, 2020, approved these two requests as based, while the Constitutional Court Act in Pristina quite frankly, PKR.n.51/2014 of July 5, 2019 and Kosovo Court of Appeals PARKR.r.504/2019 of February 12, 2020, cancelled the case, and returned the case to the first-instance court, to the retrial”, the Supreme Court's announcement said. /Betimy for Justice

Note: The individuals mentioned in this article are considered innocent unless the court finds them guilty with decision of form.