“felt pain, she was my family”, says the accused killed his wife and stabbed his wife and daughter in Germany

With the defense of accused Afet Gunter Vila, charged with criminal acts “suicide” and “heavylagos”, the trial continued Monday at the Foundation Court in Ferizaj. Indictee Guenter-Vila at the request of his lawyer Avni Ibrahimi has described the critical night that had occurred in Germany in 2002. I worked five days [...]
Indictee Guenter-Vila at the request of his lawyer Avni Ibrahimi has described the critical night that had occurred in Germany in 2002.
I worked five days a week, even on Saturdays sometimes. I lived in Germany with my wife I.G. And her daughter. We both lived well with our wife, we both lived well, had good reports with her children I sent to school and prepared food for them, said accused Afet Gunter Villa.
The same man said that his wife had friends, colleagues, was also associated with her brother's daughter, while added that she had never stopped going out with her friends, except her friend D.K., whom the accused now said had no good impression of, so her wife had told her not to associate with D.K.
We had lent her some money, D.K., after a while she gave it back to us, after which my wife told me that D.K. It went with three people, so I meant that she was practicing prostitution and that job was gaining money, that's why I didn't want to see her in my house and go out with my wife”, the defendant Guenter-Vila, reports “Justice Voctirety”.
According to accused Guenter-Vila, the critical event would not happen if the D.K. that he should not be present in the house, or that he should have left the house, when he had now told the accused Apheth to leave the same place.
I don't remember the date or the day, and I don't know if it was a work day, and it's been a long time and I don't remember, I know I've been in the influence of alcohol, the day I left home, I went to a cafe, and then I remember calling my wife who didn't answer to<61, accused Afet Gunter Vila said.
The same man added that when she returned to the apartment, she had met her wife and daughter, as well as D.K. Along with her 8-month-old baby.
How did I get into the apartment when I saw D.K. I directly told her to leave my house, she didn't leave and she started insulting me, she told me I'm neither Albanian nor German, I have Russian blood, she said well she did it to you, and other serious insults --”, confessed to the accused Gunther-Vila.
Indictee Afet Gunter Vila added that from D.K.'s insults, the clash between words had begun, while his wife said she tried to calm the situation between them, but since now the accused said it was classical for her to just leave the house.
I was addicted to alcohol, then I was affected by its words, I felt badly offended, I remember that D.K. He asked my wife's daughter for a knife when I took the knife from the kitchen. And after that, I don't remember anything else”, accused Guenter-Vila declared.
Indictee Afet Gunter Vila said that after this incident, he remembered that he had left the apartment's theatre and spent the night in a café, so from Düsseldorf had gone by train to Belgium, where he had stayed two days, then from there he had traveled to France where he had spent the night, and then had gone to Rome.
I spent the night sleeping on the streets in old uninhabited homes, everything I worked for 10 euros, because I didn't have a pre-”, he confessed.
I feel so much pain, so much regret, I'm very sorry, I loved it, it was my family” said at the end of his defense accused Afet Gunter Villa.
The proposal for the postponement of the session did not reject the defender of victims Ibrahim Trstena and the defender of accused Afet Gunter-Vila, lawyer Avni Ibrahimi.
Under these circumstances, today's sessions were postponed, and the next one was assigned on April 19, 2022.
Otherwise, according to the indictment, on November 9, 2002, in the waiting room of the common family residence on the “Dietrichstrase”, No.4 at Bad Oeynhase, the Republic of Germany, Afet Gunter Vila had deliberately deprived his wife of life I.G., following the ongoing disagreements she now felt during the year period that they had lived together in the apartment.
The charge is said to be because of the jealousy the defendant felt toward his wife, who he suspected was cheating on others on the critical day of the defendant had tried to telephone him several times, but his wife had not been notified after forgetting the phone at the residence until with her friend D. They had gone to rent some CDs with films.
On the other hand, according to the device I of the indictment, upon returning to the defendant's residence with her friend, where she was standing and her daughter H., the defendant initially asks her wife for why she did not answer the phone, constantly raising her voice while I. She had tried to convince him that she had forgotten her phone at the apartment.
Always according to the charge, the defendant was then exasperated and more by turning down a table, then I. He threatened it with the words “You're going to die” and D., I's friend. He had asked him to leave the apartment, with the same cases he had refused.
Then, the defendant, he had two hands on his shoulders.. by shaking his back and forth, which he was able to get rid of, but the same had a pull for his hair, with which D was involved. - Her friend and H. - Her daughter to be taken away from the defendant.
But, according to the indictment, the defendant had then taken a knife from the kitchen with a blade about 20cm, with which he had once hit D.-see I. In the chest and then H.-girl of I. on the belly, and then I had approached., which had struck him three times with a knife, causing him deadly wounds because of the great bloodshed, so the same day he died at the Bad Oynhausen hospital.
With this, the accused is said to have committed criminal work “the assassination“by Article 30 paragraph 1 of the KSAK Criminal Law (official journal number 20/77), which has been in force at the time of the commission of the criminal act.
According to the indictment device II, the defendant is accused of being charged by the date, time, and place the same as in the first device of this indictment, deliberately causing body injury to H.G. (I.G., age 14) and D.K. (suffering the deceased) so that while the defendant was fighting the late I.G., damaged D.K. He tried to call the police over the phone.
The defendant with a 20 - inch - long [20 cm] knife then hit the injured D.K. on the right side of the chest, causing cutting wounds, tamgenial drilling, which had caused slight bodily damage, with temporary consequences for the injury.
The defendant had then hit down H. G.- The daughter of the deceased, on the part of the womb, causing cutting wounds on the left side of the abdomin with thin intestine damage, arterital bleeding, apendix damage (result), retroperitoneum, operating intervention, removal of part of the thin intestines and apendix, which have caused serious bodily damage to the life of the injury at the moment of causing.
This is said to have carried out the criminal act “Plagos of the North” by Article 38 paragraph 2 of the KSAK Criminal Law (official journal number 20/77), which has been in force at the time of the commission of the criminal act.










