Scandal: MP Fatmire Kolcaku's brother was excluded from the Justice Ministry

Justice Minister Albulen Haxhiu has signed yesterday a decision considered illegal for the privat representative's suspension by work, Ilir Mulhrama. He is the brother of Vetevendosje Movement MP Fatmire Kolcaku-Mulhrama. Ilir Mulhrama's sponsorship was made for a provision of completing a Kosovo Telecom debt. However, the decision [...]
Justice Minister Albulen Haxhiu has signed yesterday a decision considered illegal for the privat representative's suspension by work, Ilir Mulhrama.
He is the brother of Vetevendosje Movement MP Fatmire Kolcaku-Mulhrama.
Ilir Mulhrama's sponsorship was made for a provision of completing a Kosovo Telecom debt. However, the decision taken by Haxhiu, for the suspension of Ilir Mula, is anti-legal.
This confirms a Kosovo Commercial Court decision that has rejected Kosovo Telekom's indictment of the expulsion of the Mulhrama Master's decision on the completion case against “Dardaf L. L. C”, Paparaci reports.
The Paparac has secured the first-degree decision that has been taken by the Kosovo Commercial Court. This decision dates November 24, 2022.
“REFUZAZED, demand exercised with the parachute of date 02.11,2022, by authorized representatives of the T debtor E COSOVA LECOME US with NUI 818000, headquartered in Pristina, on the exception of Private Master Ilir Mulhrama from prosecution in the final P.N.491/19 case on the 1507.2019, as unbased”, says the Commercial Court ruling.
Kosovo's Telekom had applied for the exemption of the accounts with the argument that it is completely unilateral, and this is seen with the threat it made to “Telekom” for blocking bank accounts if the means are not run.
After the deployment, according to reverseing the date 27.10.2022, debit representative Burbug Hannah ( UD. The chief executive chief of the debtor, by means of the presumption of the date 02.11.2022, has applied for the exemption of the Private Master with the argument that the Private Master should be disfellowshipped, because there is strong indifference that the Master is completely biased, and this is seen as threatening to have caused the debtors to block bank accounts, announcing that I will proceed with violent execution with the intent of fulfilling the violent obligation, so these are one of the circumstances that put him in the impartiality of<1) the decision follows further.
Dardaphone L. LC. He had responded to those arguments at the Court, saying that the demand for exemption of the owner is being made only to prevent the completion procedure.
The credit owner has stressed that the request for the exemption of the private accounts is inconsistent and that the same is presented only to prolong the completion procedure and that there is no accurate data required with the 68th N.P.A. According to the respect of the debitor, which was called at the point of Article 67 of the Law on Contestimate Procedures, the provision that regulates in which cases the exemption of the judge should be required: “If in the same case he has participated in providing the lower court ruling, or the other body; or in the mediation procedure.
So in the concrete case, the Private Master has not acted in any procedure regarding the final issue, much more so when we're dealing with a decision brought by the International Referee Tribunal, a fact that is precisely known by the debitor and the same in support of this cause has not presented any reason as required with the 68th N.P.K. Article.
The fact that the debtor has presented the reason for the expulsion of the Private Master by relying on Article 67 on the LPK, is not an actual basis because the main goal is to anticipate the procedure in order to force the private owner not to take final action with the aim of implementing the task”, says the response to the Dardafon L.L.C.
The creditor's ongoing author added that the debitor for the exception of the Masters has supported the 67th article at the LPK, reconfirmed that the request was presented only for prolonging of the procedure, that is, according to this cause the write-offs would be allowed to continue with the final actions as defined with Article 71 pregrapher 2 of the LPK, which is the reason for the exception of the terminators, debiting that we have supported the above question. The authorized Master Crediator had declared that no circumstances were manifested
It is only in doubt of his impartiality and that this is confirmed by the fact that a financial expertise has been drawn in accordance with the arrangement of the Chambers of the Commercial Court's first dilemmas and the same has been handed over to the debitor of completion, that this is stated by the debitor himself in the request for exemption of the magistrates, excluding some dilemmas that might exist in a double-off of his impartiality, that this request has not been presented either at the hearing concerning the final review of the Word for the Wordful Order in<0>.
Likewise, Dardaphone L. L.C. has reminded the Court that Telekom's request for exemption is completely unfounded.
“At the same time, we remind the Commercial Court that the debitor was always called that the court was not handling the matter with urgency and the failure of this case is affecting the increasing obligation of interest and that this is not the fault of the debitor but of the courts, while in reality presenting this request without any support basis, as I ask for the reasons for which it has been presented to highlight the fact that the debtor with his blame is increasing in the name of interest because without any basis for the long-term procedure, with this prolong payment of the debt from the document, which is so much of the country's debt, Darxtoft.
However, the Justice Ministry, led by Minister Albulen Haxhiu, except that it has made an illegal decision to suspend Ilir Mulhrama, has not respected their deadlines.
He has made that decision after the proceedings are initiated. On November 30 of this year, his decision had been made.
The MD has not respected the 15-day term for complaint in response to the Law's bailer, making a decision after six days for the suspension of the private Master, Ilir Mulhrama.
After six days of announcement, Mulhrama for launching disciplinary procedures against him, on Tuesday, December sixth, the decision on suspension has been made.
We announce that the Justice Ministry, the Department of Free Professionals, by the date 30.11.2022, has presented itself to the disciplinary Commission, RAPORT FOR THE LEARN OF PROCEDDURE DISCIPLINE, for questioning your disciplinary violations, in the quality of the private master. Disciplinary Commission, you are advised that a 3.9 subform of Administrative Guide MD-nr. 092014, for Disciplinary Procedure to the Private Masters (an approved by the Ministry of Justice by dt.13.05.2014), you have the right to be written at the address of the disciplinary Commission, within the 15th 15th 15th 15 days of the day of surrender of this announcement. Conform this article, the statement may contain your data and opinion regarding claims of disciplinary responsibility, and you can present facts and arguments to support your legal position”, says the decision sent to the owner Ilir Mulhramja.
News of the Master's suspension, Ilir Mulhrama, has been given by Deputy Prime Minister Blerim Sallah, the brother of a guilty defendant. The decision has been signed on behalf of Minister Haxhiu.
Paparac discovered this year that he is accused of being part of a <x0-muggling “group of files”. There's an indictment confirmed four years ago.
But never a session was held. In a reaction to the media, Minister Haxhiu's subordinate had said the case his brother was accused of occurred in 2012.
“In the period in question, even I wasn't even in Kosovo, with what I've been for research abroad”, Sacha was expressed.
Blerim Sassah's brother is facing the law for several criminal acts, mainly related to guilt, now nine years. He was brought to justice in 2017.















