Mustafa: I'd like to see a more lively opposition aiming to take Kurt down.

Former LDK leader Isa Mustafa, invited to the show, Chim Paska Liveh, said he would like to see a more concrete and dynamic opposition in Kosovo, which does not expect Albin Kurti to fall himself but use all ways to bring it down. Isa Mustafa added that the opposition should react as [...]
Peka: Let's go over to the opposition. While Mr. Kurti relics and always addresses Mr. Haradinaj alone, while the other two opposition leaders look very western. Do you think Albin Kurti is setting up the opposition, fishing Mr. Haradinaj and conning the opposition with Haradinaj's figure, while the two leaders of the two main opposition parties probably do not have Mr. Haradinaj's heroism in war have no sins in government and are not charged with anything. The final picture is that we have a prime minister, Albin Kurti, who is not accused of corruption and an opposition protagonist, Ramush Haradinaj, who is accused of many things in government, not of heroism.
Mustafa: As for accusations of corruption is the wrong attitude of our opposition in the assembly and of other subjects who presuming that this is a corrupt government or not. I wouldn't have said that Kurt's governance is uncorrupted because the facts speak a little differently, which means there are problems in the shifts that have been made in public companies' boards that are all political shifts that are involved in the area of corruption. They're out of trouble with payments he's got to do with the employees. There are cases behind the media when they asked for money in order to make payments, and these cases occurred in Kurt's government. There have been problems with the functioning of public prosecutorial bodies, which have been delayed completing this programme and contracts have been connected and acted without trial by this body. There have been numerous problems in the way the contracts are linked to the prosecution process that are done in negotiations and that are not done on the basis of competition, which we have not done. In my government we have not allowed neither the Ministry of Internal Affairs nor the police nor the AKI to be supplied with weapons and other things outside the competitive process. We brought you back, too. Now there are many contracts that have been made on the basis of negotiations. If the contract becomes one-on-one, then who guarantees it means there's no corruption cases there, and in this respect I think there are concessions, there's baseless estimates, but we can't just excuse anyone and say it's uncorrupted or enforce corruption. As for the opposition, the LDK has resolved, I see the PDK make it such an opposition. Will we be able to beat this opposition, or even if you can't, weaken Mr. Kurti or present to public opinion what this government is doing and what it's not doing? But I'm not sure. I've said it before, I'd like to see an opposition that's concrete, which is much more dynamic, more alive and doesn't expect Albin Kurti to fall himself or tear himself down. Each opposition must aim to bring down the government. The opposition exists in order to oppose and tear down the opponent.
Peka: So you're saying that we have more opposition who cares to keep him standing until the end of the term, Mr. Kurti, than an opposition trying to bring Mr. Kurti down?
Mustafa: In our mentality it seems so that even though I can't blame the LDK in any case that she has an interest in keeping this government to the end, the situation in us is so. There are too many arguments. Two media conferences on failures and mistakes taking place at the government level are held each day.
Peka: In English, is this the opposition you would not like?
Mustafa: By no means, there has been a lower wage for the prosecutor and judges. How can the opposition sit back and not react to this every day? Because this is weakening the justice system in the country. It is not right for the government after two years to make the decision that judges and prosecutors cut their salaries, and it cannot be reasoned because it is a constitutional court ruling of 2017, which has addressed the issue of raising the salaries of judges and prosecutors and has adopted it as legal. And now after five years, the government cannot say that the government has illegally raised those salaries.












