All doubts are removed: The former head of Hysen Durmish company was favoured in recommending the contract on more than 400,000 euros

Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Environment, Space Planning and Infrastructure Hysen Durmishi, before being a state official, worked in private companies. Durmish had worked for NNP” Sopi”, which in addition to having won four tenders from the Pristina municipality once, is now the same is aiming to win a contract suspiciously [...]
In ZV. Minister Durmish writes that he had worked as manager at the company NNP “Sopi” in 2009 -2010, owned by Naim Sopaj of Suhareka. After that, Durmish had settled down as an Infrastructure director in the Pristina municipality, at the time he led the Vetevendosje Movement. Since then, “Sopi” had won about four tenders from the Pristina municipality, which exceeded the value of over one million euros.
Hysen Durmish's former owner company has been recommended for contract by MMPHI.
Periscope days ago it reported that NNP” Sopi” has not met the criteria to announce the winner, although the contract has not yet been linked, since the process has been suspended after the complaints.
The case is in the Procuring Organization - O The E.P. Before the board of this body is taken into office, it usually authorizes its expert to sift all claims of complaining companies and then draft a report of expertise. Then, his decision, the Board supported it largely on the expertise report. He has done the same.

Periscop has seen the report delivered by two OSHP experts. They found violations by the Ministry Commission when they recommended it for a tear contract, two, company “Sopi”

The report says that the recommended contracting company for tear 2, on the list of projects presented for the nature of the work accomplished for this procurement activity, does not meet the contracting authority requirement requiring that “Operator, should provide sufficient evidence that has performed similar services (instabilities of feasibility, the project and detailed projects and the supervision of dam construction work) of at least two” contracts.
According to experts, the company on this list and in documents attached to the offer has not submitted any evidence which meets the aforementioned requirement.
“Calculating Authority assessment that this Economic Operator has done similar jobs like: “has offered the list of ten similar projects in the field of water supply and sewer systems, which are aimed at providing water for the similar population in the deletion of small and large dams, is not that the project, project monitoring and analysis of dams is a complex area in which requires calculators, reviews and analysiss that differ from the design of the channeling and the Watery Beings that are done with a single calculator and analysis of <2) the report is said.
Experts have also found other violations, with the proposed contract operator for tear 2, failing to meet minimum requirements for professional staff.
“Linked to complaining claims against professional staff applied to qualification requirements, we explain that the requirements for KE1 Team Leader is “Master degree in Construction Engineering” and the recommended contract operator has presented Mr. Mark Peplka, who has master degree at the Faculty of Geology and Mines and as such fails to meet the requirement imposed by the Accounting Authority”.
“For position KeyExpert 2 ʹgeg specialist - Master Diploma in Construction Engineering. The winning operator has offered Mr. Fadil Muja, who has a degree in industrial civil construction engineering. This degree does not meet demand. For the position of KeyExpert 3 Geological Engineer - Doplom Master in Geology Engineering or Similar Engineering Fields, the winning company has offered Mr. Fatmir Bajra, who completed master's studies in 2021 and therefore for the required qualifications, has no 10-year work experience”.
Even so, the final word for this should give the OSHP panel, which has not yet been assembled to decide on that.
Po for tear 2, O expert The EP has also found violations in the recommended contract bid in tears 4.

Here you can see a report by Periscop for the first few days regarding this tender, which is dinars in four contracts. Already, the 1 tear contract has been signed, as the same is judged by the O panel DSA:
Durmish's company, suspected, was illegally recommended for a 40,000-euro contract.










