an hour agoThe court decides about three nurses who violated the elderly in Pec
Periskopi(4 years ago)
(4 years ago)The detention measure against defendants A is set. P, the A.R. and the R.K because of the suspicion that, in co-ordination, they had to commit criminal acts. The defendants have been assigned detention measures during the length of thirty-30 days. According to the District Court communiqué, there is doubt that the same [...]
The detention measure against defendants A is set. P, A.R. and R.K because of alleged co-ordination they had to commit criminal workOh.
The defendants have been assigned detention measures during the length of thirty-30 days.
According to the Court's Community in Pec, there is doubt that the same acts of criminal responsibility have been weighed down because this suspicion rests on evidence that has been handed over by the prosecution and that with the possible finding of the defendants in freedom there is the danger of influence on witnesses who are part of the health care staff where the criminal work has taken place and who have not yet been identified and declared, as well as the impact on the declaration of the injury, since the same is in serious health and has not yet been declared.
The court has also estimated that with the release of the defendants to freedom, there is the danger of repeating criminal acts or of performing any new criminal work, taking into account the way and circumstances in which criminal acts were committed, the high degree of participation of defendants, as well as the fact that news about the country's media is circulated that the witness, with the content of the defendants' actions, has received threatening messages, in this phase allegedly sent by defendants or persons driven by them.
Therefore, based on concrete circumstances, the court has concluded that at this phase of the procedure it is necessary to appoint the detention measure for all three defendants with the aim of preventing the repetition of criminal acts, performing any new criminal work or influence in the witness”.
The court also assessed the possibility of imposing any easier measures on indictees, but found that the other measures before them by law as softer measures than the detention measure do not provide sufficient security for normal, successful and unhindered criminal procedure against this disgruntled party ruling have an appeal right to the Court of Appeals.
