Lieburn Aliu Ministry Confirms Illegal Road Preservation tender

Despite the huge noise that was created around the tender for good two Kosovo highways for three years, the ministry, headed by Lieburn Aliu, has signed four contracts. The tender is divided into four parts (lot) and Periscop has found new facts leading to violation of the tender “winter and summer maintenance [...]
The tender is divided into four parts (lot) and Periscope has found new evidence that leads to violation of the tender “winter and summer maintenance of the A7 tear 1 car and tear 2 and winter and summer maintenance of the A6 autoway, tear 3 and tears 4”
For one of them, (below: lot2) the Group of Enterprises has been awarded contract with company leader “2A Group” KPS & NNT “ABC” KPS & “B CORP” KPS & “J UBICA” KPS.
Days ago, Periscope has reported that offer of tears 2 He was a rebel. Based on the documentation that has delivered one of the bidders.
NNT Company ABC SH.P. K, he surrendered Company reference that doesn't existIt's been extinguished a few months, respectively. Overloaded company documentation offer is in Illegal and fraud against the contracting authority.
N.N.T. Company” A.B. C” has expired on 11.03.2022 the same day it was established NNT ABC SH.P.K.
The extinct owner was Arben Jetullahu, a young owner, owned by Mirsad Jetullahu.
In the tender file ) to the section of technical and professional capacities, the ministry has also requested “List of contracts carried out in the maintenance floor, the Highways, National, Regional and Local Roads, for the past three years (2019, 2020 and 2021), etc.”.
As seen in the contract, NNT ABC S. P.K has surrendered Company references gone, involving the Kosovo republic's “Summer and Winter maintenance of National and Regimental roads 2017 -2018 -19. The value of contracts 3, 239, 324.45 euros”
Periscope has received a professional opinion from the Public Procuration Regulatory Commission. - CRPP to question:
“A can accept a contracting Authority as a valid offer, if an economic operator has offered me documentation of a company that has disappeared, in order to submit the required references, if the offer is not valid, with which the article is contrary to”.
This institution has said that such a situation is not in advance of the Public Procure Law. - KCPP, but in the past this situation has been dealt with on the basis of an opinion that has emerged.ga procurement experts Under the Project: “Enhancing Administrative Capacity in the Kosovo Public Procurement field” for KCPP support, funded by the EU.
“As for the above question cited, KCPP, it has been informed that such a situation is not provided with LPP provisions or secondary public procurement legislation.
Similar KCPP questions have been acknowledged earlier, and the CRPP response is largely based on the opinion given by the consortium “Planet”, respectively, by procurement experts under the EU-funded Project “Administration capacity in the area of Public Procurement in Kosovo”.
Quote of Opinion:
“The removal of the existing economic operator means the declaration and interruption of the activity of an economic operator and the establishment of a new economic operator.
All situations and circumstances involving the economic operator that interrupts activity have to do with cutting off the activity of the economic operator itself. It is general principle that when a new company is established, it has full autonomy from that or the previous.
It's totally different when a company melts into an existing one. In this case the entire production, origin and reference is fully transferred to a company that keeps its legal capacity””, said in response CRPP for Periscope.
So according to the CRPP, the offer wasn't valid when it says that “The removal of the existing economic operator means the declaration and interruption of the activity of an economic operator and the establishment of a new economic operator. All situations and circumstances involving the economic operator that interrupts activity have to do with cutting off the activity of the economic operator itself. It's a general principle that when a new company is established, it has full autonomy from that previous”.
Meanwhile, The CRPP has not answered our question “if the offer is not valid and if a Contract Authority has accepted reference from an economic operator that has disappeared, does the KCPP have the authority to intervene in this case, because as we have seen such an event occurred at the Ministry of Infrastructure”.
Then Periscope had asked questions at the manager's address of “ABC”, the Jakupi agreement, about whether there is legitimacy in their bid, as documents of the extinct company have been presented, but this manager has not returned the response so far.
Are ministry leaders involved in the 16 million tender, for which Periscope reported ten times
On July 7th, Minister of Infrastructure, Libron Aliu It was in the country for the Internal Audition Report for the 16 million tender, where there were allegedly irregularities.
Aliu has stressed that they will co-operate with the prosecutor's investigation.
For the tender you're talking about, the irregularities we've received from the operators' complaints. The Anques have been based, and I have this report on my own, along with the deputy minister. There's a market that has irregularities and we take it very seriously and we invite the Prosecution. We're ready and we've prepared the material to be taken into this very matter”, he said.
“We are very determined to go through with it. It's just this auditing report that's initiative and that process has stopped. He's been practicing that series of media attacks on me. But as for their attacks, we don't mind that. We have to deal with the prosecutor's investigation”, he added.
Just a few days after he made those statements, his deputy, who is talked about not communicating with him, has signed four contracts, since the tender has been divided into four parts.
Data:
Lot 1, has won the group of companies with leaders “Lake Company” KPS & “Lake Trade”
Lot 2: Group of companies with company leader “2A Group” KPS & NNT “ABC” KPS & “B CORP” KPS & “J UBICA” KPS.
Lot 3: Group of companies, with company leader “Damastion Project” shpk & “Via” & “Company Eskavator”.
Lot 4: Group of companies with company leader “Arbotec” KPS & “Arbotec GMBH” Dega in Kosovo.
Two internal audits have been made for this tender. They have tallied irregularities during the process. One report has found that discriminating, or favourable, criteria have been placed in the tender file, while the other, except for identifying illegal criteria, has found that companies that have not met the criteria that the ministry itself has set. /Mentor Buzhala -Periskopi/












