European Union Justice Court has condemned Elex mission for one case in Kosovo

The failure of the work contract for this former prosecutor from Eulex has been deemed abusive by the EU Court. European media B2” (Bruxhells 2) has shed light on this case, which has occurred in the context of the European Union's decision to reduce the Eulex mission in Kosovo and transfer some files to the Kosovo authorities, as well as the Special Court founded in The Hague.

The magistrate's performance was considered insufficient “” at the end of an internal competition, which she has considered warped. After five successive contracts with the deadline set between January 2014 and November 2016, there was no longer a renewal of the contract for the former imagination. The Court of Justice of the European Union estimates there has been a conflict of interest, as the prosecutor was in permanent disagreement with the hierarchical superior, who headed the selective board for the internal competition and rejected its application. “A lack of impartiality, even a conflict of interest” is expressed in the Court's decision.

According to EULEX's “B2” repeated requests, which have been made to the former imagination to pass the vehicle's guidance test, are “hubusive”, as they can “damage personality, dignity or psychic balance”. The conductor had a driver's license, but he had confirmed that he was unable to drive because of his disability in his right hand.

European Union Court of Justice has condemned it EULEX in Kosovo with a “full reward”: equivalent compensation for 19 months' gross wage, which is added to daily spending, predictable wage growth, and compensation for prejudice “moral” at the 50,000-euro level. This is considered the first time the EU Court imposes such severe condemnation for a EU security policy and joint defence mission. The amount of compensation that exceeds $100,000 is almost equal to the amount of the contract that might have been connected.