10 hours agoEven for free, Mess couldn't play for Barcelona.
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)Lionel Messi was forced to leave Barcelona. That's the truth. Argentinian football star Lionel Messi, who with Barcelona won six Golden Balls, as well as a large number of trophies with the team, was greeted yesterday with quemp Nouı. The questions were many about why Messy did not continue. Some [...]
Argentinian football star Lionel Messi, who with Barcelona won six Golden Balls, as well as a large number of trophies with the team, was greeted yesterday with quemp Nouı.
The questions were many about why Messy did not continue. Some insisted that he demanded a lot of money, or did not withdraw from his salary, without really understanding the logic of why Mess's stand was impossible. An explanation given by Milar sends them Periscope below.
Colin Milar, newspaper reporter for SETimes, says the blame stood in Barcelona team's debts for wages. According to him, Barcelona separated 110% of the annual salaries. This automatically put the team in debt.
With Leo Messi's departure, Barcelona would spend 95% of the annual revenues in wages. That figure would again be unacceptable. It means, even at 0 euro salary for Mess, the situation doesn't change anything.
Likewise, according to Milar “Sella contract, under Spain's law, it is necessary to be the minimum 50% of the preliminary contract”. That's to prevent manipulations.
These explanations, which Periscope conveys to them at short points, also confirm the words of Lionel Messia and Joan Laporta.
Many people took the example of Pau Gassol, but in the Messi situation, the method for symbolic wage could not be applied. /Periscopi/
