He has brought together the ignorant and the criminal: VV's Feraj sharply attacks Prime Minister Rama

During the past evening, it was reported that the tear gas dump had led many participants in Korca to leave the concert in question before Bregovic started his performance.

Vetevendosje has denied having been involved in this action.

But Feraj has made a status on his Facebook account this morning, accusing Prime Minister Rama of being “indicted”, Periscope follows.

Moreover, he has named Edi Rama even the disabled “artist” until he has tried to argue his claim that art is historical and political.

Full status:

To Eddie Rama:

1. Knowledge is always historical - lying and synthesized on time. Without the synthesis of the three moments of time, not a single word, one word, no word could be:

When we say m, and l belong to the future; when we say a, it belongs to the past, and I to the future; and when we say I, mine and whether they belong to the past.

The word “mal” exists and only makes sense when it is synthetized and united in the present three times: m-a-l.

2. Art is historical: Between the artist's emotion and his present deployment in the tools of expression has always passed a time and a future action has remained. Outside the artist, art is in relation to the art of the past and the predictions of what can be created in the future. The incompetent artist, like Edi Rama, would like to eliminate the legacy of the past so that he can emerge as the original creator and origin for the future, or hide the past from which he stole.
3. Justice is historical: Much of the establishment of justice concerns the past.

Nearly no one is convicted of the crime I might commit in the future, for in the future, anyone can commit a future crime. But anyone proven a criminal is punished for past crimes. Otherwise, any criminal who committed the crime after a second could ask the judges to forget the past!

Against history are the indictee and the criminal. The first one doesn't know that there's no knowledge without the past, the second is interested in forgetting the past. The first is Edi Rama, the second is Vucinqi. But, unlike the judge who establishes justice, Rama has agreed to commit the crime of injustice because he has accepted Vuciki's request to forget his criminal past.

So Rama has brought together the ignorant and criminal. Do you think he wants to be personal evidence of Socrates's view: ignorance is bad, evil is ignorance!

Meanwhile, a-historic can only be the necessities of universal human skills and criteria: recognition, beauty, right. Without their realization, everyone remains like Rama: ignorant, unjust, unjust!