The VAR disaster in Bergamo: Judges risk suspension after terrible mistakes

“expects an explanation for the cancelled goal. Football credibility is at stake. Referees come and talk and put their faces on this case”

After the heavy loss of Bergamo against Rome, Gian Piero Gasperini was a real fury for 2-2 canceled against the zigsters, and in this case he's right because, as explains La Gazzetta dello Sport, at the Gewiss Stadium had a real catastrophe between VAR and the referee, a procedural error that would probably lead to the suspension of the VAR Nasca referee.

But it's also at risk of referee Irat.

In the 68th minute, with thebergamask players at the 1-2 disadvantage, Cristante deviates to his dock door with Zapata's shoulder and Irrat praises the goal, but by V AR Nasca informs him that behind the Roman player Palomino is in an out-of-play position. Argentina, however, does not touch the ball, and for this reason the external position can be considered active (Palomino with his presence obliges Creistan to intervene) or passive (and in this case the goal would be good), but the task of deciding does not belong to Var, who should have called the referee to review and try the episode on the monitor.