I am to blame for losing penalty”: controversy over Orsato that awarded the penalty and denied the goal Abraham

Juventus-Roma can hardly ever escape the controversy has happened this time too: Reds at disadvantages, they go into the area with Abraham who seemed to touch the ball for the Mkhitaryan (Assistent Bindon actually signalled his position out of the game, then denied by VAR), but the touch is Danilos that turned the Armenian back to [...]
Juventus-Roma can hardly ever escape controversy has happened this time: Reds at disadvantages, they go into the area with Abraham who seemed to touch the ball for the Mkhitaryan (Assistent Bindon actually signalled the position out of the game, then denied by VAR), but the touch is Danilos's that turned the Armenian into a game again.
The player, however, failed to strike, hampered by Szczesny, so the referee signalled a penalty without expecting a possible advantage that was later concrete: the ball ended at the feet of Abraham, who scored a useless goal because the penalty had been awarded. From the white point Veretout was blocked by Szczesny and the result remained 1-0.
In football regulations, on page 93, rule 12 says: “Avantage should not be implemented in situations involving serious interference, violent behavior, or a foul that requires a second card, unless there is a clear opportunity to score a goal. ”
AU DYO IN THE DHOMAV TUNEL E ZEA: “T E P ENALLY NO AVANTAZH”
At the time of the match, Dazn has heard the sound of a conversation between Orsatto and Cristente in the tunnel of the dressing room with the judge who defended himself: “The goalkeeper came out, the penaltyl, the outside position, and if he didn't whistle? At the penalty, no advantage is given. And then you blame me for losing the penalty?












