Kurt's “Younek of government are Agim Bahtiri, Mytaher Haskuka and Speed Bulliqi”

And for that, Tashol has written down what examples he can offer VV's that can guarantee this outcome.

Tashol says Kurt's government target is: Agim Bahtri, Mytaher Haskuka and Speed Bulqi.

If VV and Kurti say politics should be a tool and a goal for emancipation, the next natural question is: What concrete examples did these present - what promises guarantee this outcome? Kurt's premieres or the oar of government are: Agim Bahtiri, Mytaher Haskuka and Speed Bulqi.”, he wrote.

As Tashlo thinks, you should be on a train if you say Bahtiri, the Haskuca and Bulliqi represent emanimation.

His complete scripture:

A hypocritical mind

“Politics has a goal and that goal is the emancipation of society”.

For years this has been preached by the Vetevendosje Movement and its chairman, Albin Kurti.

We are not approaching this stance from specific contexts of political history, where the latter was experienced as emancipation. Because to experience politics as an exclusive instrument of emancipation means to educate him, and politics under the professors have often ended in Auschwitz and Gulag. In the mildest case, he created violent laborers.

We're not even commenting on the ethical perspective, because when you say politics should be aimed at social emancipation, the allusion in this attitude is the assumption that this society is backward. Hard to argue.

And we're not challenging that emancipation as discurs was used by imperial and neoimperialistic thinking, which VV and Kurt are very upset to justify any explosion in other countries. They said “we're not going to get the property of that country, but to give “to educate the country's” society.

We're taking it as accurate and noble the tendency of VV policy, which sees itself as a tool for emancipation and on this promise builds its political-public disk.

But we are analyzing it from the perspective of seismic thinking that the VV is concerned about if the promises are true then the conclusion should also be true.

If the VV and Kurti say that politics should be a tool and a goal for emancipation, the natural question that comes is: What concrete examples did these present - what promises guarantee this outcome?

Kurt's premieres or the oar of government are: Agim Bahtiri, Mytaher Haskuka and Speed Bulqi.

We need to analyze these to draw a correct conclusion to Kurt's claims of an emissary policy.

Agim Bahtiri, head of the Mitrovica municipality led by VV, is a person who in a sentence, spoken or written, makes more mistakes than producing letters. A smoke, production of Oriental capitalism that represents emancipation as a goal in politics? The first promise.

Mytaher Haskuka, the mayor of Prizren and the VV municipality, is the man who rewarded his father with a house grant; a part of whose municipal staff spend more time in court than in the municipality, because of the charges, is he representing emancipation? The second promise.

Speeding up Bulliqi, also from VV, the newly elected president of Podujevo, with exclusive diplomas guaranteeing special authority for demarcation, took the school facade to build the house on occupied land, do you think it's the example that citizens are being given for emancipation? The third promise.

These three promises, which foundations have the facts, can draw a correct conclusion to the thinking of Vetevendosje and Kurti in our politics: the machivelism without any caldre and their political schizophrecy.

To say that these represent emancipation and do not wink in front of the citizens, or you must either be cool or hypocritical with documents. Those who have read more than ten books in their lives, let them shoot their pencil.