Analyst Abdullah tells why the LGBT+ community joined the Washington Agreement

At 8th of this analysis, Mr. Abdullahu has declared that the LGBT+ (which he errs by calling it LDGB) has entered the agreement because Republicans are seeking more sympathy on the eve of November's presidential elections in relation to the Democrats.

“8) The LDGB case was unusually part of the contract between us and Serbia. With this republicans trying to gain more sympathy, and then in November, even votes in front of the Democrats, which in this segment are much more devoted and because of this approach to sexual freedoms in the United States.” wrote Mr. Abdullah.

The LGBT community in Kosovo so far has not reacted to this point, while public opinion had voiced misunderstanding.

The following is his full status:

Even some new features of the Washington Agreement

1) The Washington Agreement cannot only be assessed white or just black. Unfortunately today we have two main approaches to this nature. The government sees it only as a white deal, and the VV only as a black one. Nobody's right. This rigid approach can cost us.
2) In this big deal, the worst is a kind of lost profit. We missed the big chance, for example. To win in compensation, a railway that would connect us to Albania and be financed by the planned investors for this deal. The argument would be pragmatic that, so we open up new opportunities for Kosovo with Mini-Sengen not to remain economically discriminatedly discriminated about by neighbouring states that do not belong to the EU, but all have EU exits. (the drug involving Mini-Shengen).
3) The lost profit has taken place at 10th point on minority rights. By agreeing to remove this deal point, we have voluntarily given up on the possibility of helping, with something concrete out of this deal, Albanians from the Presevo Valley, whether in education, health, road infrastructure or so. The LDK, AAK and Initiative have made this concession. Unforgivable.
4) This agreement if it is not postponed by the US, will strengthen Serbia's overall position.
5) If we with Wyman are obliged tomorrow to help Serbia be independent of the enormous energy dependence it has on Russia (that's said Grenelli) this should be repaid with statehood, not only with new recognitions, but also to protect from the exchange of territory and Serbian community with state intelligence.
6) The VV, with its paranoid objections to Tramp Administration, LDK, AAK and Initiative, is making them appear completely pro-American. Not exactly. A government that doesn't get the best possible for Kosovo out of this deal feeds frustration from Americans in Kosovo. That's what Government did, but VV is eclipseing the bone well.
7) Our negotiating team has not negotiated, they have delegated responsibility and most of the édebat in Pristina to the AAK and Initiative Kreitar. Decisions have been made in Pristina. The team signed with the amin of leaders who weren't there. Escape from responsibility was a unique feature of a cruise event for Kosovo's fate. If tomorrow there are disappointments from the deal, party leaders will evade responsibility by saying we didn't sign it, we weren't there. And the negotiator team will say, the leaders from Pristina told us to sign it.
8) The LDGB case was unusually part of the contract between us and Serbia. With this republicans trying to gain more sympathy, and then in November, even votes in the face of democrats, which in this segment are much more dedicated and receive many votes because of this approach to sexual freedoms in the United States.
9) In this China Agreement, Russia, Arab countries are on one side, while on the other are the US, Kosovo, Serbia, Israel. The EU is neutral.
10) The claim of this agreement to independent Serbia of Russia, even in terms of energy alone, is too ambitious and unrealistic. Kosovo could cost this American geopolitical claim too much time and energy in the future, which could harm Kosovo's statehood. Kosovo is too small to pay such a large price.
11) It seems that Serbia and Vucinqi have accepted this agreement as long as there is room for tomorrow with neglect and commitment, even boycott to maintain normality with frozen and continuous Kosovo. This does not match the US, neither Kosovo nor the EU.
12) The government Hoti suffers from excessive understanding, therefore it is not worthy to deal with the living of this agreement because, under way by the Government of Kosovo, more bold and reluctant approach will be required to achieve better benefits for Kosovo.
13) This agreement could harm Serbia's reports with Russia, China and Arab countries. She has two chances of surviving this new approach. The first to take a lot to the detriment of Kosovo, or boycott and prolong this agreement.
14) To a large extent, almost all this agreement has to do with the future and the not strong, which on the road can change much. Taking advantage of it will also depend on what we do.
15) To a large extent, this agreement has no concrete, but it's very general, which still leaves many opportunities to change on the road. That's why it made it the benefits depend on what we do.
16) Especially Weiman and Mini-Shengen, as part of the agreement, leave many opportunities to change and complete in different ways and for different purposes.