The diaspora vote count is continuing, VV achieves the 53rd term, PDK remains at 22, LDK falls to 18
4 hours agoPallaska proposes a law on public health conservation cases
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)Law experts, Dastid Pallaska, have proposed to the Parliament's deputies to get Germany's law ready and implement it, to fix situations in cases of infectious diseases, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Measures for preventing and combating COVID-19 following the Constitutional Court's act of judgment considering that [...]
Measures for preventing and combating COVID-19 after Constitutional Court Act
Considering that we currently have an outgoing prime minister who exclusively focuses on electoral campaigns and consumed by his personal conflict with the president, it is important that the Parliament's deputies take over the establishment of the legal basis for the implementation of the Constitutional Court's act on measures to prevent and combat the COVID-19 pandemic.
As has already been clarified, the Constitutional Court has given until April 13th that measures for preventing and fighting COVID-19 are brought in line with the Constitution. Since the Constitutional Court has found that the Law on Prevention and Combating Influencing Diseases is insufficient for the establishment of local restrictive measures by the Government, it is clear that the completion and change of this law from the Parliament is needed.
Since the outgoing prime minister has clearly indicated that he is willing to use this issue as well (bad) for election campaigns and his personal battle with the president, MPs are obliged to consider the possibility of fulfilling and changing the Law on Prevention and Combating Influencing Diseases as urgent issues through legislative initiative.
In view of the urgency of this issue and the short deadline for action left by the Constitutional Court, MPs can take a law ready as a basis for this legislative initiative, such as German law on infectious diseases that represents a good example of how and to what extent constitutional rights and freedoms can be limited during the time of pandemic.
Say this after we realized from the experience of the past two weeks that we live in a country where even public health is not spared from political campaigns and/or personal political battles it is good to consider the possibility that decision-making measures for preventing and fighting infectious diseases is believed by independent health institutions, such as the National Institute for Public Health.
In this way public health would eventually be removed from the clutches of irresponsible politicians, who save nothing or the health of citizens in their unscrupulous race for embezzlement and power maintenance.
At the same time, the parliamentary legal initiative for a matter of public interest could also serve as an opportunity for the co-operation of MPs beyond their party affiliations, thus beginning to heal the wounds of division that have been inflicted on society these days by irresponsible politicians.
In a Facebook writing, Pallaska says that seeing Kosovo politics which, according to him, does not spare attempts for political gain even in cases of pandemics, should be adopted by the law that exists in Germany for such cases.
Full text:
Measures to prevent and combat COVID-19 in the wake of Constitutional Court Act
Considering that we currently have an outgoing prime minister who exclusively focuses on electoral campaigns and consumed by his personal conflict with the president, it is important that the Parliament's deputies take over the establishment of the legal basis for the implementation of the Constitutional Court's act on measures to prevent and combat the COVID-19 pandemic.
As has already been clarified, the Constitutional Court has given until April 13th that measures for preventing and fighting COVID-19 are brought in line with the Constitution. Since the Constitutional Court has found that the Law on Prevention and Combating Influencing Diseases is insufficient for the establishment of local restrictive measures by the Government, it is clear that the completion and change of this law from the Parliament is needed.
Since the outgoing prime minister has clearly indicated that he is willing to use this issue as well (bad) for election campaigns and his personal battle with the president, MPs are obliged to consider the possibility of fulfilling and changing the Law on Prevention and Combating Influencing Diseases as urgent issues through legislative initiative.
In view of the urgency of this issue and the short deadline for action left by the Constitutional Court, MPs can take a law ready as a basis for this legislative initiative, such as German law on infectious diseases that represents a good example of how and to what extent constitutional rights and freedoms can be limited during the time of pandemic.
Say this after we realized from the experience of the past two weeks that we live in a country where even public health is not spared from political campaigns and/or personal political battles it is good to consider the possibility that decision-making measures for preventing and fighting infectious diseases is believed by independent health institutions, such as the National Institute for Public Health.
In this way public health would eventually be removed from the clutches of irresponsible politicians, who save nothing or the health of citizens in their unscrupulous race for embezzlement and power maintenance.
At the same time, the parliamentary legal initiative for a matter of public interest could also serve as an opportunity for the co-operation of MPs beyond their party affiliations, thus beginning to heal the wounds of division that have been inflicted on society these days by irresponsible politicians.
