British polytologist: Constitutional change guarantees Kosovo no benefits, in exchange

The change of the Constitution for forming the Serb majority Association of municipalities would not provide Kosovo with anything concrete in return. That was British politician Aiden Heihr's statement. Political analysts in Pristina, however, demand that changes that undermine the functioning of the state from within be rejected. Westminster University lawmaker Aida Hehr in [...]
The change of the Constitution for forming the Serb majority Association of municipalities would not provide Kosovo with anything concrete in return. That was British politician Aiden Heihr's statement. Political analysts in Pristina, however, demand that changes that undermine the functioning of the state from within be rejected.
Westminster University lawmaker Aida Hehr in an electronic answer RTV Dukagjin, says that even if Kosovo changed its Constitution to create association, it would not guarantee anything concrete in return, Telegrafi follows.
“Of course it is true that the Constitution can be changed, but such an action requires that the government receive something concrete in return. There is no indication that Kosovo will actually gain from the relief of EU and Serbian requirements. Kosovo cannot keep spinning whenever it is required to do so by foreign powers without deeply compromising its claims to be a sovereign state”, Aiden Hehir said.
Recognitions of political developments say that in the event of the final agreement between Kosovo and Serbia, the Constitution of the two countries could undergo changes. But they require that changes not be accepted that undermine the functioning of the state on the inside.
“If it were to come to any agreement between the two countries, constitutional changes would also be imposed, especially on Serbia, which still has Kosovo in preambles. Compromise would probably force Kosovo to make constitutional changes to implement association, but they should be careful not to accept something that would undermine the functioning of the Kosovo state”, said for RTV Dukagjin, Bekim Kabashi.
The “in this negotiations that are under way in Brussels, Kosovo is disparity. The factisation of Kosovo is declining. An opportunity that has been provided by Mr. Lajcak, I think is harmful to Kosovo”, Allen Meta said.
EU envoy for the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue Miroslav Lajcak had declared that the agreement could dictate constitutional changes, saying it is not bibel to change.












