The renowned lawyer explains what happens to Edi Rama's indictment of Haradinaj for slander

He had declared that Rama had been willing to push ahead with the issue of territorial exchanges of the Republic of Kosovo with the Republic of Serbia as part of the final agreement for reconciliation and for recognising Kosovo's independence from Serbia.

The renowned lawyer, Dastid Pallaska, has an interesting explanation for the case. He says that since the object of the “slander and/or offense is a matter of public interest that as the plaintiff includes people who hold public office, [then] the burden of proof that the corresponding statement is slanderous and/or or offensive goes to the plaintiff”.

In other words, Pallaska says Rama has the obligation to testify that he has not betrayed national interests and that he has not demanded that there be territorial exchanges between Kosovo and Serbia, writes Periscope.

This means that if the indictment exceeds numerous procedural obstacles and the prime minister of Albania is literally going to have the burden of testing to prove he is not “traitor. ”” ) writes Mr. The package.

Read the complete scripture by the Pallaska lawyer:

The slandering and/or insulting indictment of Albania's prime minister against Kosovo Prime Ministerês ironically puts Albania's prime minister ahead of a absurd legal pre-trial if the case is considered in merit.

In principle, under the Civil Law against Slander and Oppression, to be freed from the legal responsibility for slander and/or contempt of the indictee has the burden of proving that his/her statement is true.

This rule has an important exception in cases where the object of libel and/or insult is a matter of public interest that as the plaintiff includes those who hold public office. In such cases, the burden of proof for the confirmation that the corresponding statement is slanderous and/or insulting goes to the plaintiff. Furthermore, the indictee in these cases can only be held responsible if he knew his/her statement was slanderous and/or insulting and acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

This means that if the indictment exceeds numerous procedural obstacles and is seriously examined, the prime minister of Albania will have the burden of testing to prove he is not a neurox0-trade. ”

On this basis, the eventual rejection of the indictment by the tribunal due to Albania's prime minister's failure to meet the burden of the test due to the law could imply that Albania's prime minister is “trander. ”