Baraliu: Bujov has the right to give his opinions, but his statements are biased.

Historian Yusuf Bujowi's statement on the KLA war has prompted many reactions, writes Perixopi. Even the connoisseur of political issues living and acting in the US, Bleron Baraliu, who has shared an incident told by Avdil Rama. Through a Facebook post, Baralius says that Bujowi is right [...]
Even the connoisseur of political issues living and acting in the US, Bleron Baraliu, who has shared an incident told by Avdil Rama.
Through a Facebook post, Baralius says that Bujovi has the right to give his opinion but that his statements are biased.
Below, read the full post of Baraliu:
As told by the late Avdyl Rama:
Bujar Bukoshi was talking to a key activist at the LDK's founder's beginnings about Yusuf Bujowi. Yusuf, after watching briefly behind the door, opened it and entered. Chat's off!
What's wrong with you? Why did I come here and interrupt?
And because of why you came here, he gave it back to Bujar by putting his finger on the table and closing it: <x2... and you won't be here again! ”
Bujar can ask His Majesty Gashi for the truthfulness of this story during the interviews you are interviewing. But I may only be able Saturday, as a direct witness in the process of politics, that after Hysen Geges to Yusuf, for the first time made at a meeting in my house as a conversational case, Bujovi had reacted furiously through a éselami éʹ pushing Gegen to protect and finally defend his statement, which he had never intended to make public.
In fact, Gega said among other things: “... she's got me swearing, the flag, and Albanian as long as she's hit with batons... But it's okay, I'm sorry, because there's a lot they've been wrong about, and now they've embraced the freedom card...” ( alluding to the former Other UDBs from Azen Vlads to Shaip Kabashi like local UDBash (Krushice, Suharek). The controversy had then begun when Bujovi denied the truth that Gega had declared, making this second to say that not accepting the truth is proof of not regret...
Whatever the case, Bujovi has the right to give his mind in every sphere, and I agree with the act of amnesty for the sake of peace and democratic social cohesion, but that doesn't mean we can ignore the moral and ideological level on which an author stands. Beyond that, his statement is biased and provocative, defaming the truth through its most negative peripheral shades...











