Anton Berisha explains his criticism of Citak's participation in Trump-paced Iftar

Anton Berisha has erased the message criticising Ambassador Vlora Citaku for participating in the iftar laid down by é read well the President of the United States of America Donald Trump.

In his explanation, Berisha tries to say it was his personal perception when he interpreted this participation of Chitak as Islamia at the White House.

Here's his full post:

In democratic European societies there are no taboo themes, and individuals show their views, therefore the dilemmas.

In public attitudes, I've shown my dilemmas to fishing actions when I thought they exceeded religious domain and touched society, just as I still have dilemmas about confusing things.

My view of dinner tabled by President Trump for Iftar, was not critical of participation, because in procedure it is the obligation that the ambassador from the Foreign Ministry receives, is not critical to the diplomatic act of participation itself.

But if it's not critical, the dilemma is a perception.

In the aim of European integrations, Kosovo and the region, there must be proof and news about the extent of achieving reform and fulfilling the conditions required by the EU, not through global identification protagonism, for the simple reason that our power is insignificant.

Capturing across Europe, like the case of Bosnia or Serbia, playing with religious cards, are examples, for me, not good, until the example of Montenegro, which has made a separation, is giving better results.

The dilemma stands, that if we don't integrate Kosovo into the EU, then the EU will integrate our citizens, as is happening every day, which can lead to the drastic reduction of the population.

It is evident that this goal of going has no ethnic or religious motives, but because of the life perspective that enables the European model in respect of the individual.

As a citizen of Kosovo, with the conviction and European formation, when these things get involved I have the right to set this up as a dilemma; despite the inaccurate reading or deliberate reading of individuals or certain groups.

The attempts that every thought to be reduced to only one segment are the known scheme of totalitarian thinking of labelling forward and contrary or against them, and they, something weather seized by European thinkers of our reinformation.

Their goal was to unite the peoples who live in peace and enjoy freedom with the motto of unity in contrast, without the exclusiveness of ethnic, religious or ideological.
This is the model I represent.

Otherwise, this was Berisha's status yesterday, which, it seems, has been erased today because we are not looking at his Facebook account: