Sami Hamiti gives testimony in the trial to the president of the NCU and the other accused.

Ademi and Rama are charged that with order for material gain, they had forced and threatened to damage Dritaro Cadolli, in terms of paying a type “car SINCE X5”, worth 30 thousand euros, which was then claimed to hand over the then chairman of the Pristina Municipal Assembly, Sami Hamiti, reports “Justice bet”.

At Wednesday's session at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, the final word was provided, but prosecutor Feti Tunuzliu has proposed that Sami Hamiti be heard in the witness's quality, since, according to him, he was the key witness in this criminal case.

According to him, after completing the past judicial review and analyzing the subject, he had analyzed that the Hamiti witness was of interest to be heard because of the full and just confirmation of the actual situation.

“Vlerring that the same has had to be declared as to whether it is true that a car was offered to it, was it called by the accused to have a meeting, was it known that the accused had talked to him about a car and in circumstances about a September 7, 2012<1> telephone conversation, said prosecutor Tunuzliu.

That proposal was rejected by defenders of indictees Ademi and Rama, lawyers Qazim Qerim and Ramiz Krasniqi.

According to the defendant's defender, Ademi, the Decirim attorney, at the last session all evidence had been seized and that it was not necessary to hear the Sami Hamiti witness, after he had issued a statement to the prosecutor as a suspect, and to the prosecutor to have fired the investigation.

Rama's defender, lawyer Ramiz Krasniqi, also rejected the proposal, for according to him, the prosecutor when he was looking at the subject papers saw that there was nothing incriminating in the case, and that he tried to bring a witness earlier on the same case had been suspected.

The entire procedure initiated has been due to this witness, so the prosecutor wants to bring the same one in long, I demand that this proposal be rejected because it is inappropriate and delayed”, the lawyer Krasniqi said.

Later, the court panel led by Judge Valbona Musliu-Selimaj has approved prosecutor Tunuzliu's proposal since the next session, which is expected to be held on 21 May 2019, at 13:15 a witness to hear.

Otherwise, at the January 30, 2019 session, the two defendants have seized the legal right to defend in silence, saying they remain close to the statement they had issued to the prosecutor EULEX, May 2, 2013.

The Act against Rama and Ademi has been set up on 14 January 2014, in co-operation with EULEX's Constitutional Prosecutor, with the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina.

According to EULEX prosecutor Maerten Groothuisen and Prosecutor Ilaz Beqiri's claims at the first point of the indictment, indictees Ademi and Rama during July 12th 12th, September 12, 2012, with the aim of material gain had threatened and attacked victim Dritro Kadol, forcing the same action to hurt his property, respectively, to make unfair profit in the amount of 30,000.000 euros, or a car called “BMW X5”, which the car was later supposed to surrender to Pristina Municipal Assembly Chief Sami Hamiti, performing criminal work forcing him to co-ordination.

Meanwhile, at the second point of the indictment indicted Ademi and Rama are accused of exercising influence in co-ordination.

According to the indictment, the two indictees had demanded from the injured Kadol the pledge of unfair profit -- the sum of 30,000,00 euros, or type car “respectively. SINCE X5”, looking for the exercise of their improper influence in decision making an official person who in this case is the head of the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, Sami Hamiti, to change the status of a land course from the green “area to “construction area”. /Betimi justice