Selmanaj answers to the PDK League: We're not anyone's agents, you're from underground.

Selmanaj, who along with Vetevendosje MP Jalal Svecla chair the commission, has called Hajdar Beqas's statement ridiculous, saying it is. PDK and coalition PAN, who are hindering the dawning of the Egyptian expulsion case.

Selmanaj says about Periscope that the PDK people have the experience with the underground, so they also think about things like that.

More than ridiculous statements. And if we drop in on the content of what he said, believe me, like I appreciate his speech. So it's not worth it, it's not worth discussing or taking it seriously. We in Kosovo know who has been in service and who has been part of the services. And which in fact has the greatest experience of PDK people working underground in Kosovo, while for us these can be meant in ironic approaches, in ridiculous approaches, but such are, like Mr. Beqa, if she deserves to be called so, Selmanaj said of Periscope.

He says he is. The PDK is sabotaging the commission's work. Selmanaj says they have remained from the past to try underground activities in politics as well.

Who are they? It's the PDK, the PAN coalition. They're blocking this thing. And this shows who's in service, or who's in service function or not to say that they've been, and maybe even today they've had some of the past that underground activities try to measure in politics. But they chose the wrong address for bad luck. Drive all activities you do, make them totally public and in the interests of the state of Kosovo. This is important, Selmanaj says.

The LDK deputy says that their work and commitment to this case are evidence that there is no such suspicion as Hajdar Beqas.

If we were connected to any service we would not do the job with such competence, we would not send the draft report to the prosecutor, we would not contact all international embassies in Kosovo, normally we would not have the response of the friendly states of Kosovo United States, Germany and Great Britain. All of this, and especially the U.S. statement, is clear, indicating politicians' sabotaged tendencies toward this commission.

MP The PDK, Hajdar Beqa, in a statement in Rubik, has spoken about the report on the expulsion of gylenists, saying that the parliamentary commission is deliberately not doing the job on the issue.

Beqa doubts Vetevendosje MP Jelal Svecla and LDK deputy Driton Selmanaj work for any Turkish agents, Periscopi broadcasts.

If a commission has 11 members, it cannot work on the commission for parliamentary investigation. Get the law, Google it. You can't even hear any witnesses. I don't know what they said. But I know and have often suspected that they will not work for any Turkish agent and are uninterested by dawning the case. That's exactly Mr. Sfchla and Mr. Selmanaj. If they had been interested, they had finished their work. I'm not saying that they're working for Erdogan, but I can say with the greatest sincerity that I had been chairman of the commission had failed the commission. All members would have been opposition. I had a compromise. She said Beqa.

The Parliamentary Investigative Commission, which has been dealing with the investigation into the circumstances of the expulsion of six Turks from Kosovo to Turkey, has released the final report several days ago, where a host of violations and irregularities are recorded. The expulsion process, reportedly in the report, has been contrary to Kosovo's Constitution, laws and underground acts. Then, in contrast with international standards and human rights instruments.

He sent the same guy to Special Attorneys within the day for further investigation.

The following are violations, as found in the report:

(1) By automatically implementing the Kosovo Agency for Intelligence (“AKI”)'s application for revocation of residence permits of Turkish citizens, without considering whether the information provided by AKI met the legal criteria for being “threats to national security”, Department for States, Asia and Migration (“D SAM”, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, violated Article 5 of Law No. 05L-031 for the General Administratoral Process (see expert, pp. 25H29).

(2) Mr. Deportation. Hasan Huseyn Gunakan, without any legitimate orders, poses violations of Article 55, par. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo; Article 1, par. 1 of Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention for Human Rights; and Article 13 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (see Experts, pp. 29,31.

(3) The fact that Mr. Gunakan in the Republic of Kosovo after his wrong expulsion, constitutes violations of Article 25, par. 1 and 2 Administrative Guide (MPB) No. 09-2014 for Foreign Return of Illegal Attitude in the Republic of Kosovo (see Experts, pp. 29,31.

(4) Taking part in the operation to expel six Turkish citizens, who did not intend to collect information, AKI officials have exceeded the legal scope of AKI with Article 2, par. 1 of Law No. 03/L-063 for the Kosovo Intelligence Agency (see expert, pp. 3133.

(5) The lack of a memorandum of co-operation between the Kosovo Police and AKI, which deals specifically with co-ordination of joint operations, poses violations of Article 8, par. 2 of the Law for AKI, as well as cause insufficient legal uncertainty and protection of human rights (see expert, pp. 335034).

(6) The Directorate for Migration and Foreign Assistance (“DMH”), under the Kosovo Police, has issued orders for the departure of six Turkish citizens, without meeting any of the conditions set by Article 97, par. 1 of Law No. 04/L-219 for Foreigners (see Experts, pp. 4,337.

(7) Orders for forced departure were issued on Article 6 and Article 99, par. 2 of the Law for Foreigners, although none of these provisions can according to the law serve as the basis for this type of order (see expert, pp. 4,337.

(8) The form of forced departure did not match the demands of Article 97, par. 8 of the Foreign Law, which stipulates that: “strangers are communicated in written form, in one of the official languages and in the English language, . . . by explaining . . The location where [the Order] will be executed [and] the means of transporting it to the destination site” (see expert, pp. 4,337.

(9) Some police officials have not informed Turkish citizens of their right to legal protection and to contact family members. This anonymity represents violation of Code No. 04/L-23 of the Criminal Procedure, Article 13, par. 1; and the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, Article 29, par. 2 and 3 (see Experts, pp. 3,3739).

(10) Some other police officials did not take appropriate measures to inform Turkish citizens of their rights in Turkish, even though these officials had noted firsthand that some of the Turkish citizens did not understand Albanian. This represents violations of Article 13, par. 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code; and Article 29, par. 2 and 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo (see Experts, pp. 3,3739).

(11) Six Turkish citizens were not offered counseling and judicial representation, which poses violations of Administration Guide No. 09-2014 for Foreign Return of Illegal Standup in the Republic of Kosovo, Article 12, par. 6 (See Experts, pp. 37H 39).

(12) DSAM, failing to engage in the expulsion operation, has not carried out its obligation to secure flyages for Turkish citizens who did not own travel documents. This represents violations of Article 8, par. 1 and 3 of the Law for Foreigners (see Experts, pp. 39 41).

(13) The Division for Readmission and Kthim (“DRK”), under DShAM, not engaging in the expulsion operation, has not carried out its obligation to prove the identity of Turkish citizens who did not own ID documents. This represents violations of Article 30 of Administration Guide No. 09-2014 for Foreign Return of Illegal Attitude in the Republic of Kosovo (see Experts, pp. 39 41).

(14) DPS, failing to engage in the deportation operation, has not carried out its obligation to organise transportation for the six Turkish citizens. This represents violations of Article 32 of Administration Guide No. 09-2014 for Foreign Return of Illegal Attitude in the Republic of Kosovo (see Experts, pp. 39 41).

(15) DSAM, not engaging in the deportation operation, has not carried out her established obligations with Article 37 of Administrative Management No. 09-2014 for Foreign Return of Illegal Attitude in the Republic of Kosovo, including co-ordination of the security escort, providing personal assistance for return and ensuring medical association (see expertise, pp. 39 41).

(16) Because of the DRC's non-announcement, Mr. Mustafa Erdem, who owns Albania's citizenship, to return to the state he wanted. This represents violations of Article 17, par. 6 Administrative Guides No. 09-2014 for Foreign Return of Illegal Attitude in the Republic of Kosovo (see Experts, pp. 39 41).

(17) By not introducing the data of six Turkish citizens into the Border Management System for Access and Outcome, police officials have acted in opposition to the Standard Overview Process for Border Management ( DOK-05/01/2017, 25 June 2017) (see expert, p. 41H44).

(18) By not checking the travel documents of six Turkish citizens, police officials have violated Article 15, par. 2 of Law No. 04/L-072 for State Border Control (see Experts, pp. 41H44).

(19) Police officials decided to ease border control in the case of six Turkish citizens, even though the legal conditions for such relief were not met, set for Article 16, par. 1 and 2 of the State Border Control Law (see Experts, pp. 41H44).

(20) By placing the square seal on forced evacuation orders, which constituted neither identification documents nor travel documents, police officials have violated Article 17, pars. 1 of the State Border Control Law (see Experts, pp. 41H44).

(21) The deportation of six Turkish citizens to a country where there was real danger that they would face torture or punishment or inhumane or degrading treatment is a violation of international customary law; Article 3, par. 1 of the Convention Against Torture and Treatments and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Punishments; and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (see Experts, pp. 488.

(22) Presenting false data data to the Ministry of Infrastructure concerning the number of passengers and the purpose of flying, the Birlesik Insaat airline has violated the (MI) state of traffic. No. 02/2015 for Charter and Taxi Flight Approvation NoHPEA, Article 10, par. 1 (See Experts, pp. 5053).

(23) Invisibility co-operation between the Ministry of Infrastructure, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Border Police has resulted in a failure to prosecute legal procedures for punishing this airline. These procedures are defined with Article 97, par. 2 of the 03th Law L-051 for Civil Aviation (see Experts, pp. 5053).

(24) Not making final decision regarding Mr. Osman Karakaya for continuing residence permit, DShAM has violated Article 44, par. 1 of the Law for Foreigners (see Experts, pp. 5358).

(25) Failure to recall the final decision in Mr. Karakaya has also deprived her of the right to complain, guaranteed to Article 6, par. 3 of the Law for Foreigners (see Experts, pp. 5358).

(26) By not taking appropriate measures, until the day of expulsion, to notify Turkish citizens of their revocation of permits, DSAM has made it impossible for them to contest these revocations. This represents violations of Article 108, par. 3 of the Law for General Administratorial Process (see Experts, pp. 5358).

(27) Mixing elements of the order for forced evacuation and deportation order, the DMH has severely limited the possibility of six Turkish citizens exercising their right to complain. This mixture of two different orders is not predicted anywhere in the Foreign Law, or in any other normative act, and therefore has been illegal (see expertise, pp. 58H60).

(28) Since all of the six Turkish citizens lived in the Republic of Kosovo with close family members, their expulsion prior to exercising the right to complain presents violations of the right to respect family life, according to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 36, par. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, read along with Article 13 of the Convention and Article 32 of the Constitution (see Experts, pp. 61.63.

(29) Six Turkish citizens were expelled before exercising the right to complain, even though there were no strong reasons for national security to expel before exercising that right, and there was no other necessity for such a measure. This represents violations of Article 13 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights; and Article 55, par. 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo (see Experts, pp. 655.

(30) The fact that Turkish citizens were not informed about the actual bases on which they were refused residence permits has prevented the exercise of the right to complaint in the months following their expulsion, presenting violations of Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights; and Article 1, Par. 1 of Protocol No. 7 of the Convention (see Experts, pp. 6569).

(31) Not informing the State Prosecutor over the suspicion that six Turkish citizens were committing or committing criminal acts, AKI violated Article 25, par. 2 of the Law for AKI (see Experts, pp. 1,7733./ P ERISCOPI/