Good luck: LDK sacrificed on Osman candidacy

In Rubikon, in the election process debate, Pacarizi has said that prior to deep analysis of the election results, the LDK has trouble explaining how the second came up, even though it was the first in the polls.

According to him, attempts at achieving the pre-election coalition between the VV and LDK, which in the 6 October elections came first with VV leading less than one percent before LDK, were in vain.

The two parties claimed the prime minister's position. The LDK took a step forward to prevent the pre-election coalition from nominating Vjosa Osmani for prime minister and Albin Kurti had retaliated with an unfair invitation for Osman to lead the list. It was insincere because it came when the LDK couldn't download Osman from the nomination and respond to the VV. The LDK took steps to defeat the VV coalition and responded with a popular invitation that seemed to do work, and now we have the situation when the VV is ahead by LDK vote, and it needs a little time to explain the issues to itself why S dealt with elections. The LDK needs time to explain to itself where the guilty one has won because all polls have released it by 3-5 percent before VV”, he said.

“The LDK must clarify one thing that is very simple in essence. Many sacrifices have been made in the LDK to ensure this unity, which was represented through Vjosa Osmani and with all those sacrifices came out the second non-first party. He is anxious to explain this and then has to go on deeper tests, which of course each party has to do”, he has said further.

According to him, it would be insincere even if the parties now change their mind which candidate has the most votes to be prime minister, not as stated earlier on which party it wins it will lead the government.