Daka's Full Recount Enjoys parties that suffered losses in elections

This recount is emerging to be welcome for parties that did not get a satisfactory seat in the 6 October elections, and some of them failed to pass the election threshold either. It says Periscope.

Andrew Shala from the Social Democrat Initiative in a proposal for Periscope says that to be such acceptable elections, then the recount would be necessary.

Considering the mistakes that have been on the form, then the only way for these election results to be acceptable to all political subjects even for Nisman and, above all, to maintain credibility is for all boxes to enter a recount. So maintain the credibility of the elections and the result be acceptable to all parties, Shala said.

The same opinion with the coalition party was shared by AKR's Vesel Makolli. He says that many as a party have been damaged by these elections.

Makolli further stresses that the removal of this party's commissioners and observers from polling stations has left room to misuse coalition votes NISMA-AKR.

We've already made a letter for a full recount since we're damaged, especially the non-representation AKR. Commissioners and observers have been few, and in some centers they've been away, so we're all about recounting and counting at the Recount Center because there's the best surveillance. Either way, it's much better for us to recount, because there's deliberate mistakes somewhere on purpose and they're hurting you. I'm sure the AKR would be much better off if we went back to recount. We think we've passed the threshold since votes from the diaspora will be recounted. He's heading for Wessel for Periscope.

While, Muharrem Nitaj from AAK, says no party should be afraid of recounting the votes, thus expressing itself open to recounting.

We've noticed that there's frustration on all sides. Even by political parties, not a few candidates. So I think no one needs to be afraid of recounting all the boxes. The vote is in the box and the result has legitimacy only according to that vote. We as a party have not discussed whether we are about total recounting or not, but I am convinced that there is no one who is against recounting! No, no, no.

Adnan Rrustemi from the Vetevendosje Movement talking about Periscope stresses that the total recount of the votes would be meaningless at this time and that there is no basis for making such a decision.

It also stresses that the CEC has all procedures completed in the QNR and that the notes that are being counted are only those from the diaspora.

As far as the CEC is concerned, all procedures are finalised at the QNR, the votes coming from the diaspora and the CEC will now be counted. As for the overall recounting of votes, there are no more bases and no issues on the agenda. In the meantime, there is no basis for any recounting of such political subjects, eventually there may be complaints by candidates of various political subjects at PZAP. So neither there is any basis nor do I expect to have the mass recounts of such, nor the recounting of political subjects eventually any decision on the basis of candidate complaints ends the Rrustemi.

We remember that according to the Central Election Commission's preliminary list, the number of citizens eligible vote in the October 6th early parliamentary elections is about 1 million and 900 thousand, while according to the Kosovo Statistics Agency registry, in 2018 the total population in Kosovo was nearly 1 million and 800 thousand.

The list of voters of the Central Election Commission, according to CEC spokesman Valmir Elezi, stems from the extract of the central civil registry and includes all citizens rightly living inside and abroad.

The reason why the number of citizens most eligible to vote and residents is rough is because on the voter list there are eligible citizens in and out of the country, while only residents of the population who have been present in Kosovo during the census of” had said./Periscopi/