Bujovi: Handke deserved the prize, Nobel's jury is not affected by the tea shop's words

Writer and historian Jusuf Bujowi at “Debat Plus” has commented on the division of the Nobel Prize for Literature to Austrian controversial writer Peter Handke. Bujov has said the jury is responsible for sharing prices, but according to him, they are not affected by the tea shop's words. “How much information do I have- because we speak up without [...]
Bujov has said the jury is responsible for sharing prices, but according to him, they are not affected by the tea shop's words.
I've got the information that I've got-- because we're talking down there without information, the jury doesn't think it's from any level of sat to hear the words from different teahouses. Protocols and decisions 50 years are kept closed”, Bujowi said.
He said that in his assessment of Literature, it is primarily taken on paper.
“would also have to take into account the moral aspect, but their deeds [the writers] are defining”, he said, conveys Telegrafi.
Bujov says the issue of a writer's assessment is personal, and according to him, Handke in literature has deserved Nobel.
They've heard words down and down that he's a mediocre writer. He is a German writer when he published a book at 24 years of age, and his work was then making headlines.
The writer says Handke was a rebel writer, and according to him, he considered Yugoslavia's destruction a conspiracy.
He recalls a clash he had had with Handke at an international meeting where he says he had presented documents that Yugoslavia was being destroyed from the inside, not from the outside as Nobel Prize for literature already claimed Yugoslavia was being destroyed from abroad.
““And these documents are part of the plot. I don't want to hear anything any more”, he told me, and he left the meeting with a show-off.












