Serbia has become tax points, now says Haradinaj will suffer most

Serbian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ivica Dacic, commenting on President Thaci's indirect appeal to Prime Minister Haradinaj for the removal of the tax on Serbian goods, has said this is a “game” joint call of the heads of state, where “is likely to largely have consequences to Prime Minister Haradinaj”. The chief of diplomacy [...]
The chief of Serbian diplomacy, speaking of a Serbian television, has also commented on Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Serbia, as well as the position of EU Diplomacy chief Federica Moghrini, regarding the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue.
Daciq said the US will not allow Kosovo to be an obstacle to reaching a permanent agreement.
“Mike Pompeo [American Secretary of State] asked me what the problem is when Kosovo is at question and said America led a political pilot, as it was 20 years ago”, Dacic said.
While speaking of the position of President Thaci regarding the tax on Serbian goods, Dacic said that “what Thaci has declared is no signal that the tax will really be lifted”.
I don't think we should idealize Thaci too much. If you have read, Hoxhaj and Wessel have stated that it was their idea to set a 100 - percent tax, and Wessel is a man of Thaci. This is the joint game, in which it appears that Haradinaj” will most mostly have consequences, he said, sends the telegram.
Dacic has also talked about the position of EU Diplomacy head, regarding Kosovo-Serbia dialogue, saying any solution must go through the Security Council.
The “what has been done so far does not need to go to the Security Council, but if it comes to efforts for a permanent solution, it will return to the Security Council, because it would be logical for Resolution 1244 to be replaced by another. Sergei Lavrov [Russia Foreign Minister] has sent a letter to Mogerin asking him to inform her of the flow of dialogue, but she did not immediately announce it. The most important part of the letter that Lavrov was sent to from Mogerini is that the EU values Russia's role. This is good, because it confirms that it still needs to be discussed and will be important the role of our friendly countries, Russia and China”, Daciq said.
He added that, this does not mean there will be a change in dialogue format, “but if there are indicators that there will be a positive effect, then it is possible that in terms of organisation all be involved.
“The US is involved in dialogue from the beginning, Russia is not. This is bad and what we have remarks about, but Serbia itself has applied for dialogue to be transferred to Brussels, but the decision was wrong because countries who side with us” do not participate, Dacic said.











