Thaci does not stop: Don't passionately mention Pandora Box, we'll get Presevo and recognition from Serbia

The president of the Republic of Kosovo, Hashim Thaci, has written another on his Facebook account in the wake of desperate efforts to change public opinion about the correction of borders, writes Periscope. Thaci has criticised those he has called "sceptics" of the peaceful agreement with Serbia, saying these [...]
The president of the Republic of Kosovo, Hashim Thaci, has written another on his Facebook account in the wake of desperate efforts to change public opinion about the correction of borders, writes Periscope.
Thaci has criticised those he has called "theceptics" of the peaceful agreement with Serbia, saying they are wrong because the agreement will be entirely in line with international law.
Such an agreement, writes Thaci, Kosovo ensures formal recognition by Serbia and “the co-ordination of Presevo, Medvedja and Bujanoc, as well as paves the way for EU membership, NATO and UN”, ends the word.
Furthermore, the president has said that the eventual agreement would not open Pandora's quota nor would it create a negative precedent for other countries.
Read Thaci's full text:
Message to skeptics of the peaceful agreement between Kosovo and Serbia: NATO's freedom struggle, humanitarian intervention, Kosovo's declaration of independence co-ordinated with the international community, supervised independence and statehood, are just some of the features that have led Kosovo to be treated as a special case. On the eve of the declaration of independence, there were concerns that Kosovo could serve as a precedent for countries or other regions in the world. But such concerns proved inaccurate. Also, another major concern was the fear of the mass ecstasy of the Serb community living in Kosovo. This concern too proved completely incorrect. Surprisingly, even today, when Kosovo has opened up the possibility of reaching peaceful agreements with Serbia, flashing and in many ways, raised unstable concerns. Skeptics, today they are together again to challenge Serbia's real option of peaceful border correction. They easily spread fears of allegedly destabilising the region and deepening ethnic division in the Balkans. They create panic and fog by making the same arguments, just as they do on the eve of declaring independence. I have high regard for all those who are rationally involved and committed to reaching the peaceful agreement with Serbia. As for those who are opposing by producing only fear, I regret to tell them that they are wrong. The peaceful agreement based on the correction of the border between Kosovo and Serbia, if achieved, will be entirely in line with international law. Such an agreement, Kosovo provides formal recognition by Serbia and the association of Presevo, Medvedja and Bujanovac, as well as paves the way for EU, NATO and UN membership. The peaceful agreement strengthens stability by closing the last course of conflict in the Balkans. Hence, skeptics of this agreement can assure that there will now be no correction of the border along ethnic lines, no ecstasy of the population, no domino effect. Moreover, this peaceful agreement will lay a heavy stone on the so-called “Content of Pandora”, which these days are being spoken of with many passions. And if someone certainly argues and refers to a final agreement on the peaceful correction of the border as precedent, then this case will really be used in the future as a positive precedent necessary to resolve interstate disputes only peacefully and not war. HTH











