Reasons of the detention assignment for Enver Sekiraq's brother and grandson

The Constitutional Court in Pristina today has reviewed the Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor's request for the appointment of the detention measure against Enver Sekirras's brother and grandson, suspected of wounding Zenel Jashar. The Constitutional Court has approved the prosecution's request for the detention action against indictees Naser Sekiraqa and Fatlum Abazi. [...]
The Constitutional Court in Pristina today has reviewed the Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor's request for the appointment of the detention measure against Enver Sekirras's brother and grandson, suspected of wounding Zenel Jashar.
The Constitutional Court has approved the prosecution's request for the detention action against indictees Naser Sekiraqa and Fatlum Abazi.
The defendants have been assigned a month-long detention measure for each except from June 12th until July 12th 2018.
The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina had filed a request for the appointment of the detention move against defendants Naser Sekiraqa and Fatlum Abazi because of the suspicion that the same have committed the same criminal offence in attempted and co-operation, as well as criminal conduct of possession, control or unauthorized possession of weapons.
In terms of this request submitted by State Prosecutor, suspect Naser Sekiraqa has said he did not commit the criminal work he suspected of because at the moment the case occurred was at a funeral, for which he has declared whether he can testify with some witnesses/persons who were also participants in this burial.
I think I can mention a lot of the other witnesses I've met with at the cemetery of what the same might say we were together, not as the prosecutor says...
He has stated that with the injury of this case Zenel Jasharin never had any reports.
And I know that with Fatlum's brother, I've known him in our neighborhood, and no reports I've ever had with him, and I know that there was a problem with Fatlum's brother, and then he accused me of having been a part of his case. I'm not without Zenel”, suspect Naser Sekiraqa said.
While Nasser Sekirasa's defender, lawyer Florent Latifaj, had introduced a USB video recording from the city cemetery, which claims to prove that his client was at a funeral at the moment.
“E supports my defense statement and, as he said, the alibi was not on the scene, I present it to the court The flash drive from the city's cemetery with video recordings, where you see the moment of my defense arrived at the cemetery at around 16:30 and until the funeral ceremony starts you're seen the same with those who mentioned it to themselves, said lawyer Latifaj.
He has stressed that he considers there is no doubt based on the fact that his defense has committed the criminal act that is being burdened because according to lawyer “at the same time cannot be the same person in two countries”.
Regarding the danger the suspects could escape, lawyer Latifaj has said that if the danger of escape existed, the suspects would leave and not be found at home.
There's Nasser Sekiraqa at home, opening the door and telling him that we've come to the raid while Fatlum is sleeping only an hour and a half after doing the job and that at home, if there's a risk of escape, they'd be gone, and how could someone who gave 13 bullets to someone's body and injured two himself, Latifaj lawyer declared.
And Fatlum Abazi had said that he was asleep when the police went home.
“ ...I've slept and when the police came I'm out I locked the door and when the police asked me if I'm Lucky Abazi, even the cops looked at me and saw that I just woke up from sleep so that I had no knowledge of the case that I am now in court”, Abazi had said.
He has further stated that he has no problems with the injured.
I've already had no problems with the injured, but my brother Fahri Abbas has been injured eight times on both legs, and in 2012 he has had trouble with my younger brother Fatball Abaz while I've never had a problem, so I feel completely innocent in this case”, declared Fat Ablum.
Even Fatlum Abaz's defender, attorney Mentor Neziri, has rejected the request for appointment of the detention measure, adding that no legal condition that has been outlined in the state prosecution's request is supported.
While the state prosecutor had declared that he remained close to the written requirement for the appointment of the detention measure.
Pre-procedure Judge Allton Murseli after analyzing all the evidence presented by the parties has analyzed the suspicion that by June 12, 2018, about 17:15 minutes in front of the “high school. Sami Frasher”, located on the “Ibrahim Lutfiu” in Pristina, defendants on the basis of the preliminary agreement have attempted to prove life to the damaged Zenel Jasharin and at the same time risk the life of Nazmi Uka, due to an earlier conflict the defendant Naser Sekiraqa has now attempted to prove injured Zenel Jashar.
“The way the defendants and the N.N. have witnessed the movements of now damaged Zenel Jashari and the moment the same person was in the “type car. Ford<x2... Green... which led him now to the injured Nazmi Uka, the defendants exploit the created situation, the column on the road and one of them is offered to the passenger vehicle, and since the vehicle window has been opened with guns in its hand and puts your hand into the car and it shot 13 times in the direction of the damage Zenel Jashari, it has caused the injuries of the injured to be seriously and rapidly removed from the scene of the event”, it is said in the decision on the detention measure provided by KXO.com.
According to this act of incriminating action, there is confidence that the same acts have been carried out and that if found in freedom they could prevent the course of criminal procedure by hiding, changing, or counterfeiting the evidence of criminal acts, as well as by influencing those who have not yet been heard by the prosecution.
So under these circumstances, according to preliminary procedure judge Allton Murseli, legal causes have been presented for the appointment of the detention measure against defendants, since given the nature of the criminal act and its risklessness at present is necessary.












