KMDLNj proposes that tax on Serbia increase 50 %

The Council for Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, commenting on the Government's decision on the 10 per cent customs duty for Serbia's goods, has estimated that freedom of movement and free flow of goods, as basic human rights and as guarantors of economic development in Kosovo are being brutally violated by Serbia, assisted by a part of the EU countries' bureaucracy, criminalised Kosovo businessmen and a criminalised part of local politics.

KMDLNj via one communique says Serbia has made 100% political blockades of Kosovo and has proposed that this tax be raised to at least 50% as if to be implemented 100% reciprocity with Serbia, and therefore believes they will have the support of Kosovo citizens, regardless of the price they have to pay.

KMDLNI's complete communication:

The Kosovo government made a decision that goods from Serbia and Bosnia are charged with a 10% customs duty that prompted immediate response of Serbia, Bosnia, Goran Rakiqi of occupied Mitrovica and, according to a caratism, even of EU bureaucratics who, not only in this case, implement double standards, mainly at the expense of Kosovo and in the defence of Serbia. The goods from Serbia have flooded the Kosovo market and are not subject to any control as if they have dramatically increased informality in Kosovo's economy, even fragile.

Many businesses in Kosovo, their business empire, have established it by importing it without criteria and standards, goods from Serbia, as well as by being financially supported by Serbian tajkuns who have laundered dirty money through it in Kosovo. Many of Serbia's businesses in Kosovo have caused tax evasion by running out of customs duties through hiding or paying taxes. In this way they have greatly damaged Kosovo's budget and local producers by making them uncompetitive, not only in international markets but local ones as well. Setting a 10% customs tax on goods from Serbia and Bosnia is a symbolic, short-term and more a political bluff for the fact that taxes have had to be imposed on Serbia and Bosnia on the level that harms Kosovo on the international stage, and this has had to be decided since Kosovo's declaration of independence when Serbia launched an open struggle for Kosovo's destruction, both in the international and domestic plan.

The international community has shown injustice to Kosovo by allowing Serbia to intervene flagrantly in the internal affairs of a state whose independence has recognised the destructive part of these states. The EU is using double standards and is double-faced, even in terms of visa liberalisation by setting additional conditions for Kosovo, which were conditioned for no Balkan state and by postponing visa liberalisation towards conditioning for political concessions that generally harm Kosovo.

The dedication, as a means of achieving political goals and others, is a criminal offence that is sanctioned by domestic and international laws. The EU, conditioning Kosovo policy to do so, is subject to negotiations that harm Kosovo, has brought Kosovo citizens into the ghetto, thus denying them basic human right, freedom of movement. With a clear attitude of subsisting some major businesses in Kosovo, Serbia's economic but political interests have turned Kosovo into an economic colony of Serbia, aided by EU bureaucratics which CEFT-an interpret according to their standards, becoming allies in recoloning Kosovo. The EU, with immoral play and double standards, is extremely violating the human rights of Kosovo's citizens by putting them on a one-way street with no exit. Kosovo businessmen who represent and advocate Serbia's economic interest in Kosovo inevitably have political support, otherwise they would be accountable for the damages they are doing to the Kosovo economy and local producers. These businessmen are immoral, filthy and harmful to Kosovo and its citizens.

Serbia is conducting a disastrous campaign against Kosovo in the political, diplomatic, sports, cultural, economic, economic, economic plan, while the EU does not take any action to force it to adhere to agreements signed in Brussels. Serbia difficults freedom of movement for Kosovo citizens, in the event there is a possibility, and cannot help it as if it arrests Kosovo citizens on slandered and slandered charges and that there is no reaction from the EU that pressures and conditioning leads against Kosovo. Serbia's recent campaign to withdraw the recognition of Kosovo's independence from the countries that have recognised it before is flagrant intervention, which is not being judged by EU states, and thereby are contributing to tensioning the situation, until the outbreak of violence that can easily be envisioned. The EU has played an extremely duplicable role, especially in the division of Mitrovica and in addition to the anti-anti that is not allowing the opening of the bridge over the Iber River, until it ends the completion of the creation of a new ethnic and political reality in this occupied part of Kosovo. The EU has legalised the ethnic cleansing of northern Albanians, has prevented the construction of broken homes of Albanians as if it supported colonising this section through the construction of only Serb homes in the Sun Lagen, preventing Kosovo institutions from establishing an urban order there. Currently, there is no more violated country in Europe than Kosovo as far as freedom of movement and economic development is concerned, and that this is done by those countries that are hosters of these values. By the time Serbia begins to behave as a normal country, Kosovo must take all actions to protect territorial integrity and the extent of sovereignty, in full accordance with the Constitution of Kosovo and international law. Kosovo must behave towards Serbia under the principle of honouring reciprocity that regulates interstate reports in all countries of the world. Why should Kosovo make repeated exceptions by damaging itself? And why should it be trusted and subject to personal interest and clans within the EU itself by severely damaging Kosovo and its citizens? Why should I talk to Serbia about issues about which no normal, independent and sovereign state talks on internal territorial and border regulation issues? The awareness of citizens, if at the right level and in accordance with the country's interests, would make the 10% customs tax small, placing Serbia and Bosnia denying the purchase of goods from these states 100% until these states behave in this manner as they are now being brought in. In a report with an ets that 100% is hostile to you, economic patriotism would precede and condition political patriotism. Take Israel's example after 1948 when he declared independence, he bought local products even if they were fivefold more expensive than others. Every normal state, protecting domestic producers and local products, creates conditions for a real economic development and enables new jobs to open up. Only one state that favours productive society has clear prospects of economic development, while the current Kosovo society is consumer (most of the goods from Serbia, Macedonia and Turkey) so we don't have enough economic development or guarantors to raise the welfare of citizens' lives. Freedom of movement and free circulation of goods and ideas, such as basic human rights and as guarantors of economic development in Kosovo, to be extremely and brutally violated by Serbia, assisted by a part of the EU countries' bureaucracy, criminalised Kosovars in Serbia's service, and a part, also criminalised of local politics.

KMDLNj has suggested that this tax increase to at least 50% as if 100% reciprocity with Serbia is implemented, and for that I believe they will have the support of Kosovo citizens, regardless of the price they have to pay.