How did the Thaci brothers ' illegal director make the person who beat Ganiu today

Although Pushcol Thaci ended up in a physical conflict, Pushcol's arrival at the head of the BKS was closely linked to the influence of the president's brother, the mechanism often reported on by his brother's president, writes Periscopi.

To come to that position, Pushcol had also been supportive of Bureau Director Gani Thaci's duty in 2016. Pushcoli had been elected director in this position, although days earlier the interior audience had arranged serious violations during the election process.

Periscope will explain why the choice of Pushkoll in this position, held today, was illegal, which the audience had reacted to.

The audience in 2016 had said that the process of selecting the new BKS director was manipulated.

The decision to form the Commission to select candidates for executive director has been signed by BKS Assembly Chairman Blerim Pushcoli at the meeting, held on 1407.2016. The Commission's proposal for the aforementioned candidate poses conflict of interest, as the president's vote at the Assembly's meeting where it was voted for the commission's formation, which has been tasked with selecting possible candidates for voting at the Bureau General Assembly for Executive Directors, implications conflict of the interest of the commission's members, favours candidate Blerim Pushkoli”, the Auditor report said.

Despite that, the assembly and then the CEC had approved his choice in this position.

The audience's reactions were not halted, calling the process of electing director of Pushcol completely illegal.

But after Kikoli's election to this position again has reacted to the interior audience, calling the selection process illegal.

The audience warned that the Bureau's executive director is elected the candidate, who gets two-thirds of the votes of members of the General Assembly.

The BKS has a total of twelve members, so the majority of the Bureau's 2503 members are eight. After the end of the vote at the General Assembly with the date 07.09.2016 none of the three candidates proposed for executive directorship by the Commission has received the necessary 2503 votes of members of the General Assembly, which should be 8 (the eight) votes to conclude that the process ended on the basis of the Bureau's Statut, Article 21, which defines the way of selecting executive director”, the Auditor report said.

The representative of the insurance company “had reacted against the decision to elect Pushcol at this institution. Security” and insurance company “Insig”. In company representative “letter Security” directed to the Assembly said that under BKS provisions, the Bureau's director is elected by 2/3 of the votes of members of the General Assembly.

Honored Assembly members, I inform you that based on the BKS provisions any decision by the Assembly's leader, or whoever is not based on Article 21 of BKS status dealing with the selection of the executive director is invalid since the principle is known in jurispence that special law is sending the general law, in concrete case the legal basis of the 130013/3 decision is not in accordance with the relevant character of the special character and binding case. For us any tendency to try to legitimise a decision without legal grounds is unacceptable and not mandatory. We ask competent bodies to deal with concrete cases and to prevent such decisions in the future from being repeated”, the letter sent to the Assembly says.

Also opposed has the insurance company's representative “Insig” reacted. In a letter sent to the Assembly, it says it joins the logic and precise legal analysis of the company “Security”.

“It is difficult to react to such situations, but I personally invite Besarit to withdraw his signature and at the same time buy to react personally to”, says the Security Company representative's letter “Insig” to Assembly. /Periscopi/