Ismaili Ismaili: Lieburn, s'ke need to disturb the public, collect signatures for KP

Vetevendosje Movement MP Ismaili Ismaili has reacted to MP Libun Aliu, who rejected some of President Visar Ymeri's statements concerning the divisions and situation created within the Vetevendosje Movement, writes Periscopi. While Ymer says that the meeting of LVV) General Council deepens even more, Aliu thinks that exactly [...]
While Ymer says that the meeting of LVVA General Council deepens even more, Aliu believes that this meeting is the solution.
In Ali's publication on the matter, MP Ismaili has commented, who tells Ali he is unable to understand why I am not collecting 40 signatures for holding this meeting, without having to disturb the public.
“Liburn, to call the meeting of the General Council, calls for 40 signatures of KP members. This, in the Movement statute, is, at least I feel, exactly the most democratic way to call the meeting on these occasions. I believe 40 signatures are being collected immediately, without having to disseminate the dispute in Headship away in public. I'm not in Headship myself, and I think that no meeting makes sense without Albin getting out of prison, but if you think you should meet the KKP, I don't understand why he's collecting 40 signatures, and, without status on Facebook, without having to bother the public, by calling the meeting under the statute of Movement”, it's said in Ismaili's statement, in the publication of Libron Ali.
Read the last one on Facebook full:
The definition of domestic democracy applies through the general Council's meeting, the application of the spirit and the letter of the statute, even through domestic elections. Where everyone has the right to run for Movement Speaker including Albin Kurti.
Antidemocratic even contrary to spirit and letter and statute is that someone within the V Movement EVIDENCE - to set conditions and even blackmail with a tendency to eliminate someone from running for headGold. This is not only unacceptable but punishable.
But democracy is not only procedure but also procedure. So we have to follow our internal democratic procedures. The procedure that imposes on us institutions caught with procedure on a democratic subject like Movement V is not equal EVIDENCE!
In that sense, what Wiszar Ymer said today is not the attitude of the majority in Movement V. I'm sorry. They are even biased and do not represent the complete truth.
One who is called in unity does not accept dedication.
On the other hand, it is pointless to talk about agreement or consensus outside its organs when the V Movement EVIDENCE! has the legitimate General Council elected by free and democratic votes for its membership.
For any of us overcoming our legitimate organs is an attack on domestic democracy.












