an hour agoThe Court of Appeals makes that decision for the three physicians of Gjilan in the case of Arbenita Spahiu
Periskopi(9 years ago)
(9 years ago)Kosovo's Appeals Court has rejected it as unconventional based on the Constitutional Prosecutor's complaint in the case of accused M.S., H.Z. and V.K. In this way, the three-judge criminal college of this court has confirmed the act of Constitutional Court in Gjilan on May 31st, by which May, [...]
In this way, the three-judge criminal college of this court has confirmed the Constitutional Court Act in Gjilan, the 31st of May, by which the accused M.S., H.Z., had been acquitted of the prosecution of criminal activity “irresponding medical treatment” and V.K. “
Among other things, the Court of Appeals' bias states that the court's decision in the first instance is clear and concrete, in which reasons for crucial facts have been given, evidence and justice have been reasoned when it is considered that in the actions of the accused do not stand the elements of criminal acts they were charged with. The Court of the First Century has also reasoned on each evidence separately, the same links between them, arguing why some evidence has forgiven the belief of some no, as well as the reasons in which it is based on the case of resolving this penal-juridical issue.
