Muharrem: 250 million Euros for Mediterranean Games “Pristina 203018x1> will pay Kosovo, donation scan

European integration director Shenoll Muharremi has shown that for the Mediterranean Games to be held in Kosovo in 2030, Kosovo itself will pay all preparations, writes Periscope. As Muharrem has clarified, then why the government introduces it as a 250m-euro <x0m-investment to the Mediterranean Games are citizens and businesses who [...]
European integration director Shenoll Muharremi has shown that for the Mediterranean Games to be held in Kosovo in 2030, Kosovo itself will pay all preparations, writes Periscope.
As Muharrem has clarified, then why the government introduces it as a 250m-euro <x0m-investment to the Mediterranean Games are citizens and businesses who will pay the preparations.
“Businesses and citizens of Kosovo from work, their taxes from Kosovo's public budget will all be paid. It's not a grant or a donation. You pay the bill.
Did the government or anyone make the feasibility of economic reasonableness before deciding me for big projects like this? Probably not. What is the economic reasonableness of this decision? No economic reason. Businesses will have to produce, circulate about 1 billion euros to pay this bill (from taxes that the government will collect) of 250 million, which will in fact take place at the end of 300m euros for Kosovo taxpayers”, wrote Muharremi.
His full post:
About $1 billion The Cost of Mediterranean Games for Local Business
Who pays bills for preparations for the 2030 Mediterranean Games in Pristina? The government's presented as Uurime, we have 250m euros in investments for the Mediterranean Games. People thought the government was. FITO 250m euros. Not really! Kosovo's businesses and citizens from work, their taxes from the Kosovo public budget will all be paid. It's not a grant or a donation. You pay the bill.
Did the government or anyone make the feasibility of economic reasonableness before deciding me for big projects like this? Probably not. What is the economic reasonableness of this decision? No economic reason. Businesses will have to produce, circulate around 1 billion euros, which will pay this bill (from taxes the government will collect) of 250 million, which will in fact be made at the end of 300m euros for Kosovo payers.
What is the benefit of this decision? (a) Improving Kosovo image; (b) Pristina will benefit most; (c) Construction and (d) Sportsmen. That's it. Businesses will pay the bill. It's not bad after such big projects, but there's a paradox here.
- The money will be paid by taxpayers and Europe's most marginalised businesses are not any donation or grants that Kosovo has earned. All preparations up to the last cent, about 300,000 euros will be paid to the country's businesses from our taxes;
- There has been no assessment and reasonableness of economic feasibility for this decision by the government. Those who are paying the money are not asked or consulted on this decision. Here was the tradition to place some people who are called ministers without asking those who receive and manage money;
- Masters and businesses in Dragash, Kamenica, South Mitrovica and Virut, Gacanica, Soganik and others will pay the bill and the cost of investments in Pristina. Is that right? They won't benefit from this driving. So everyone pays the bill, benefits only us in Pristina;
- What could we do with 300,000 euros? For one thing, if we had been richer, this subject of economic reasonableness was not discussed. But look at health and education. Conditions are not good and efficient. Is it more important to invest 300,000 euros in health and education or to have fun for 10 days?
- Had it been more reasonable and better to invest 300m euros in business ecosystems in Start-Ups, Incubators and Business Akcelators effectively or in the Mediterranean Games that no one else wanted to organise because there is no reason for this economic crisis. 300 million investments in these areas might have given us back 3-5 billion for 5-6 years. How much will we get back from the investments at LM 2030? We also need the Opurtune cost of advance.
- The government doesn't even think about it! This government is left. It takes the means from the rich and distributed needy ones from 100 euros and 50 euros as charities. That's not wise to insist that businesses and those tools go out of the country through the imported consum (-50%) GDP a year or nearly -5 billion a year. POR in this decision ruled against its own policies. A right-hand decision. Most, or about 70% of the tools, will end up in construction businesses, so to the rich of the country. As the government wrongly calls them at the olygarks. This is not a policy of equality at all that the bills are paid to Dragashi and Mitrovica, and the benefits are Pristina and a small group;
- There's nothing wrong with organizing the International Games, but we have to do the math and see reasonableness in advance. No reason has been done here. It's done by wish. It's like you have a house with a roof or a roof that puts the water in the rooms but you buy a fancy car or you build a pool in front of the house. There are 10 ways that 300,000 euros would better serve the country's economy and citizens.
- Inflation destroys us, the government allocates 300m euros to give them in the country that increases domestic productivity and reduces inflation in luxury. The equipment for processing, processing and refreezing so that the cost of vegetables and trees does not increase by 100% as it is now. Someone could say "Economia Digje, Government Creet"?
- The decision has now been made, we must make the best of it. Investments to be made must be modified and adapted so that the more the economy can gain. Tents should be designed and programmed to the most extent possible so that they do not earn just a few businesses. Instead of 20 big contracts, make it 100 mediums. Encouraged by businesses from other regions, that the tax bill is being paid not only by Pristina's big businesses...
- I'm not arguing against the 2030 High Games. I'm arguing about taking decisions rationally and with preliminary consultations. There was no reason or consultation here. No one's ever thought about how and who's gonna pay the bill. A chaos in decision-making and political-making. This should be well discussed, and during the time of the future, we don't have this kind of unwarranted decision.










