hace 5 minutosSospetó que violaron a un niño de 14 años, medida de detención designada para dos sospechosos en Prizren
Periskopi(hace 2 años)
(hace 2 años)The Constitutional Court in Prizren has appointed the detention measure for a month against two suspects for criminal offence, writes Periscopi. Notification: The Constitutional Court in Prizren, the Department for Mytur, the trial of the procedure, has assigned the detention measure in length of a (1) month, which will be counted since the detention of 21.03,2024 and [...]
Notificación:
The Constitutional Court in Prizren, the Department for Mittur, the judge of the procedure, has set the detention measure, in length of a (1) month, which will be counted from the time of arrest of 21.03.2024 and may last to 20,04.2024 against defendants D.D., (20 years), and P.B., (19 years old), due to suspicion that each committed a criminal act of violence by Article 227 paragraphs 7, (when the criminal person 1 (El que obliga a la otra persona a cometer actos sexuales sin el consentimiento de esa persona), el KP del Código Penal de Kosovo.
El juez del procedimiento preliminar después de celebrar la audiencia para el nombramiento de la medida de seguridad y la audiencia de las declaraciones de las partes, y sobre la base de pruebas sobre los documentos de asunto, ha determinado que la solicitud del Fiscal del Estado para la asignación de la detención se basa.
The court, in case of detention, has estimated there are legal reasons for the appointment of this measure, and from evidence collected until this stage, is a suspicion given that the defendants alone have committed the criminal act for which they are suspected.
In the case of the detention appointment, the Court has taken into account the fact that the case is in the initial phase of the investigation, and the defendants and the eventual witnesses will be questioned. Así que con la liberación de los acusados a la libertad, hay especialidad de que lo mismo impedirá el curso del procedimiento de investigación.
The court has found that the appointment of the detention measure at this stage is necessary, taking into account the heavy burden of the criminal offence for which defendants are suspected, and the circumstances under which criminal acts have been allegedly committed, so with the release of defendants, there is the risk of fleeing with the intention of avoid criminal responsibility.
Desde el principio, el Tribunal ha llegado a la conclusión de que en casos concretos el nombramiento de detención para los acusados es necesario y razonable.
