Rejected VV's complaints, no revote in Malisheva and Han of Elez

Rejected VV's complaints, no revote in Malisheva and Han of Elez

The election panel for Ances and Parashtesa has dismissed the Vetevendosje Movement's complaints of partial revote in Han of Elez and Malishev. In the VV complaint, 13.26% of the vote in Han Elez and 9.32% of the vote in Malisheva is alleged to have been cast in the ballot boxes with assistance, but P ZAP has ascertained that these [...]

The election panel for Ances and Parashtesa has dismissed the Vetevendosje Movement's complaints of partial revote in Han of Elez and Malishev.

In the VV complaint, 13.26% of the vote in Han Elez and 9.32% of the vote in Malisheva is alleged to have been cast in the ballot boxes with assistance, but P The ZAP has found that these complaints are unsuccessful and has not been taken in any of the complaining parties' claims.

According to the LVV, there are 20 thousand and 465 valid votes -- out of them, according to Vetevendosje, 1,000 and 908 votes with assistance.

Elections in the Malisheva municipality by 52 percent have won the candidate NISMI, Ekrem Kastrati at once incumbent chairman.

LVV candidate Valon Hoti came in third.

The percentage of votes with assistance in the Malisheva municipality totals 9.32% of all valid votes, out of 20,465 valid votes in the Malishev municipality, 1.908 are eligible votes. At various locations, selected as concrete evidence, the percentage of votes with assistance amounted to over 20%, with the argument that in over 90% of voter cases/ja nuk she sees and she doesn't know. From the total number of polling locations in the Malisheva municipality to 37 polling, which represents 50% flat of all locations in this municipality, the number of votes with assistance ranges from over 10% to 21.30%”, it says. A complaint.

In complaints, the percentage of votes with assistance is 1.3% and in some other 21.3%, notes.

There are 59 with assistance, or 21.30%! In the same municipality with similar economic, social, geographical, educational and health circumstances, we have VV 30/1001 with 306 voters with assistance, or 1.30%, as well as VV 3011/10 valid votes with just 4 with assistance, which makes 1.29% close to sound logic, even though in these places the reasoning is illegal and constitutional. There is no scientific, social, political or statistical explanation that could justify voting with assistance because he doesn't see, he doesn't read anything.

“From the interpretation of these legal provisions, the panel estimates that, the complainer's complaint was filed after the legal deadline, since, the complaining party's complaints about irregularities that took place on the day of elections held on the 1210.2025 vote due to the high number of voter assistance on election day, and that the polling centre was closed on 12,10.2025, where the party who claimed to have violated its rights in the case of the vote, had the right to file within 48 hours's closure of the polling centre, while the complaint was handed over on the 27th, on the other page of irregularities, which the pre-prison says the pre-prime or 122025 times before.

The same, Vetevendosje Movement, also complained about elections in Han Elez, which has won Democratic Party candidate Mehmet Ballage with 134 votes margin from Rufki Suma an independent candidate for whom Vetevendosje has complained in PZAP.

A total of 5,015 valid votes, 665 votes are identified with assistance or 13.26%. While the gap between the first candidate, the winner of the election race without a run-off and second candidate, is only 134 votes, it turns out that the number of votes with assistance is 5 times greater than the difference of votes (134) between the two candidates in the” race.

In decision, P ZAP has stressed that the complaint is made after the initial legal deadlines. /Periscopi/

Latest
Related