Who decided to attack Top Channel, and why?

The event, which shocked no small public opinion, occurred at 6:0 on March 27, when unidentified persons attacked the building with Kalashnikov.

They are still on the run, and the only sign left behind is the burned vehicle on the Durres-Rrogozhina Highway, in which were the two AK-47 model fire guns, as well as other items related to the vehicle (store plates in Tirana or even cracked shells).

Cameras have also fixed only one moment of arrival near television on the secondary route of the Durres-Tirana Highway.

Thus the Tirana Police Directorate realised the dynamics of how the serious attack took place, but the motives behind it are still unclear.

Police themselves say that they have analyzed the evidence, thus determining some investigative versions.

The staff and television leaders were called by the effectives and firmly testified that they had no open conflict with anyone.

The final trial among shareholders, the activity of this television, different investigations, staff personal issues or Big Brother.

These are the themes that are constantly circulated in the media, but unconfirmed in no official source.

As for the first issue, no less than two months ago a clash between the Hoxha family and two other shareholders was resolved in court.

Both sides claimed ownership, but the Supreme Court made the decision in January, leaving the ball in the hands of Vjollca Hoxha and the heirs of the founder of Top Media, the late Dritan Hoxha: Laurel, Sara, Redia and Ethan Hoxha.

The clash between them has been legal, and there has never been before any case pointing to the possible launch of such a conflict.

Also, numerous investigative emissions are conducted in Top Channel, and the media group itself named the attack as a terrorist “kt that violates the free word”.

So in simple words they have suggested that the attack comes from people who may have been affected by television publications.

But why now, since Topi has been on the Albanian market for years and investigations have always been realised?

The other thesis that has found spread is that of Big Brother, paying attention to how much influence and “power” has had the format since launch.

More than that, various journalists and media analysts have made statements saying that “clashes” among Big Followers may have “remade” this attack of this “well thought-out”.

Could it have been “mlle” for this last one so large that 25 model 56, five rounds of shells and nine rounds of militant ammunition were found at the scene?

The last thesis that just came out was the link to the attack with former Paul Cole's brother, the 61-year-old who unfortunately lost his life after the attack.

The first doubts were thrown at his former brother and friend he had, but after questioning they were released.

Adding to this is the fact that from the construction of the event, it was understood that the bullet that touched Paul Cola was recouped - he had not been the target.

As in any other event, outside affairs should not be excluded.

Basically the problems any member of the governing staff may have had outside of Ball's life and leading to such conflict.

But at the end of the day these are just the themes, and from the police we've got the answer to the question: How?

Who and why remain a mystery.