Where, Lumez? Constitution announces prosecutorial that the Decani Monastery decision is not being implemented

The Constitution has reiterated that implementing its decisions is the obligation for all Kosovo persons and institutions.

“Gjykata reiterates that implementation of its decisions is the obligation for all persons and institutions of the Republic of Kosovo based on Article 116 of the Constitution. Moreover, the implementation of final decisions is the fundamental principle of rule of law, as the fundamental value of the constitutional order of the Republic of Kosovo, as defined by Article 3 [Envious to Law] and 7 [Verences] of the Constitution”, the statement said.

The EU chief in Kosovo Thomas Szunyog, who has demanded that the Constitutional decision be implemented, has reacted in this regard.

“I welcome today's Constitutional Court statement requiring Kosovo authorities to execute all previous court decisions, and the decision not to implement both decisions, including 2016's decision in the case of Decani Monastery property. Failure to execute the Constitutional Court's decisions violates both the Constitution and the fundamental principles of rule of law. I call on authorities to take steps to ensure that the Constitutional Court's decisions, including the decision that allows the registration of the Decani Monastery and other judicial authorities to be executed immediately and arbitraryly. The EU is committed to Kosovo's development. Respecting rule of law and judicial decisions is a fundamental European value and key to any progress. This benefits everyone in Kosovo. Our goal is clear. We see Kosovo with a European perspective, sharing common values”, Szunyog's statement said.

Constitutional Court announcement:

1. In Court Act KI 132/15, the motion-proposor had disputed two rulings of the Supreme Court's Special Chamber of Court College on issues related to the Kosovo Privatisation Agency, respectively, the decision. AC-I-13-0008] and [ AC-I-13-0009 of June 12th 2015, claiming violations of fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the articles: 24 [Afflicted Law], 31 [Rights for Justice of Law and Impartial], 32 [Justice Rights], 46 [Protection of Property] and 54 [Religion of Rights] of the Constitution and Article 13 (The right to effective solution) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Following the assessment of the request's presumption claims, the Court had ruled that the two controversial decisions of the Supreme Court's Special Court hearings of June 12, 2015, are invalid, while the two decisions of the College Specialised for Property of the Supreme Court Chamber of December 27, 2012, respectively. SCC-08-0026] and [r. The SCC-08-0227] are final, mandatory and, as such, are the Judicata res. In accordance with paragraph 8) of the 66th rule of labour regulation, the Court has consistently forwarded the implementation of these two judgments through its mechanisms and through correspondences with the parties involved in the respective cases, which are reflected in the published Act on Non-breaking. After assessing updated information regarding the implementation of the KI56/09 and Cl122/15 Act, the Court (i) unanimously found that the same information has not been implemented because the responsible authorities have not taken necessary measures for their full implementation, as required with Article 116 of the Constitution; and (ii) decided to be reportedly related to the two non-exploitation arrangements. The court reiterates that, implementing its decisions is the obligation for all persons and institutions of the Republic of Kosovo based on Article 116 of the Constitution. Moreover, the implementation of final decisions is the fundamental principle of rule of law, as the fundamental value of the constitutional order of the Republic of Kosovo, as defined by Article 3 [Envious to the Law] and 7 [Verences] of the Constitution.