"Absolutely disgusting," Moes is being accused of destroying the teenager after he took him out of the Odubecon game.

David Moes ran an 11th strong for the match at Old Tuffford, broadcast Periscope.

But the Checans created very little, and eventually were defeated 1-0.

It should be suggested that Moes was without the main attacker, Michael Antonio.

Andriy Jarmolenko was interviewed as an attacker, but replaced in 54 minutes.

18-year-old Ademiippo Odubeko was interviewed instead, but failed to have the impact.

Although West Ham was in search of the goal and Odubeco was the only natural attacker, Moes decided to remove it when there were eight minutes left in the hearth.

This decision has been strongly criticised by the president of the ʹtalk SPORT, Andy Goldstein.

I need to talk to you about David Moesey,” said Goldstein.

The new Odubeco boy, only 18-year-old, was interviewed instead of Jarmolenco in 54 minutes. He then left 58 minutes later.

I think this is disgusting. I think it's absolutely terrible.

I can imagine David Moyes who knows enough work to know if a player is good enough to inject him.

And I don't believe for a moment that after 58 minutes, he looked at the player and thought, well, I didn't know, he's not that good.

Video: Watch the irresibly wasted moment as former Man United Kid Odubeco is the sub who's addicted on his Old Trafford return for West Ham#MUNWHU Pic.twitter. com/ SQjzaqNM0Z

) Africa News (@Afriupdatecom) Febbery 9, 2021

I think this is absolutely disgusting. Let the boy play, take somebody else away, Noble. I think it was absolutely disgusting by David Moesey. You can destroy the new one, you can break it.

”58 minutes in a Cup match, like the only attacker on the team, what do you expect from him? Hat-trick?

I think it's absolutely disgusting. David Moes must have known exactly what kind of player he has before replacing him.” /Periscope. com/