Kosovo Supreme Court reacts after said there has been poor performance in performing subjects

The Supreme Court of Kosovo has reacted to a research done by GLPS, which considers this court to have shown poor performance for 2019, why the efficiency of performing subjects is 95%. By means of a media communique, the Supreme has said that it has sought clarification from GLPS on what [...]
The Supreme Court of Kosovo has reacted to a research done by GLPS, which considers this court to have shown poor performance for 2019, why the efficiency of performing subjects is 95%.
By means of a media communiqué, the Supreme has said it has requested clarification from GLPS on what basis is considered poor performance the 95% of the subjects have been carried out, reports news.net.
“Supreme Court during yesterday, following presentation of the Kosovo Law Rule Institution Performance Index, by G The LSP, has requested clarification from this organisation regarding the weak performance of the Supreme Court “, the efficiency of the implementation of 95 percent, by 2019”, is said in response.
“So, like the Court, we've been asked to announce how the Supreme Court's maturity and efficiency is measured, and on what basis is estimated the poor performance, 95% efficiency (counited to the KRC Web graph, for the efficiency of courts during 2019)”, is now said in the communique.
For the sake of fair public opinion information, the Supreme Court says that (not including DPS) there are no materials inherited from the early years, and the subjects of this year, except for a part that came in the last months of 2020, have been completed.
“also, if G The LSP has received statistics from a year ago, presented on the KRC site, according to the linked graph, it can be seen that it is not the Supreme Court with the weakest hierarchy”, according to them”, it is said there.
<x0) The LSP, that the same “data for the judiciary has shown that higher efficiency in the outcome of the subjects has had basic courts. The Supreme Court, on the other hand, has had the worst performance in relation to other domestic courts”, the Supreme Court, deems it inappropriate to consider the fact that 95 percent efficiency cannot be described as weak, according to any kind of analysis or mathematics”, is highlighted in the communiqué.
The Supreme Court says that examining subjects with extraordinary legal means is only one aspect of the work of Supreme Court judges, in addition to giving judicial thought, principled attitudes, harmonisation of penal policy, and other professional aspects.












