Who's cheating? Driton Selmanaj's statement of the found

Driton Selmanaj is the first person to have already been politically persecuted by Vetevendosje, who yesterday made the decision to prevent presence at the plenary sessions of the Parliament but not telling about the means it would use to make the decision.

Kurti's party interpreted Driton Selmanaj's statement as an attack on war victims, the unknowns, Saranda Boguyevci, etc.

On the other hand, Driton Selmanaj said the declaration was being distorted for political purposes, and that he had expressed his fatigue that the subject of the found would be used by political parties for electoral gain, Periscope follows.

But what is the truth after all this noise?

The following is the transcript of all that was said at that time to understand more accurately the context that led to this politician's public link:

Below you find the debate on the subject of the undiscovered:

Oluri: Do you feel guilty, Mr. President? Selmanaj that what happened today is the derivative of one of your responsibilities as deputy prime minister, because the moment you tell the parliamentary commission that has been consumed with the reporting instrument, then you've caused a toll like this.

SelmanajNo, it's not.

Oluri: I don't agree with you and no government official when you say that we get a name for him, Saranda Boguyevci is abusing the subject of the found. Does it seem a little too serious to you if he accuses a survivor of the massacre, maybe every one of the MPs in the country can be accused of abuse on the subject of the found, but can't be accused of surviving the massacre.

SelmanajNo, no, don't try to give her credit because we're tired of this approach, we're tired, we're tired. As a government, we have put the first theme of the finder, for 10 years in Kosovo minimally has been addressed by politicians and governments, the first topic we have established. Even the instrument of parliamentary control and parliamentarians as a concept in Kosovo, I have worked 10 years directly in the Assembly and believe I know instruments. Can't the parliamentary commission and the assembly to call me about the same topic to make fun of you.

Oluri: You can't even tell Dritton that the deputy prime minister.

Selmanaj: Just a second, beyond parliamentary instruments, powers have dignity, powers have authority. You get cold on a case, with the logic you say you can call me six times a day and call me right there.

Oluri: It is not the government that determines when dignity is violated when not.

Selmanaj: What did you do to me, to mock you?

Oluri: Then if we leave it to the government, the moment you as a government appreciate that your dignity is being violated then ignore the assembly then we are not the parliamentary republic. On the other hand, if Sarada Boguyevci is also told that he is abusing the subject of the found, I don't know which MP in the Kosovo Assembly is the person who may not abuse me and discuss me seriously. My personal belief is that Saranda does not abuse this subject.

SelmanajListen, I'm trying to say why, on this subject we've already debated in the Assembly as a topic, twice on the parliamentary commission has the prime minister reported 1 time, the minister of justice. At the request of the prime minister, the prime minister said I would come to the commission without calling the commission, and he said I'm begging you with closed doors because he has to give me information that I think is not good enough to go public because of the sensitivity of the case. It's been, two hours since the report, no questions have been asked by commission members including the MP in question. Saranda Boguyevci, there wasn't because the arguments, the information they were given, aren't good.

Five minutes after it's done, it's on the media, same thing. Saranda Bogujevci) and says the prime minister is here when you listen to him. They say nothing, but why would you challenge the prime minister after you had him inside? Which, unfortunately, it's too heavy to say, they're being abused for a handful of votes on a topic a society has a big grave.