a minute agoAhmeti: Government must do what Pristina is doing, but multiply by 100
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)Pristina Mayor Shpend Ahmeti has once again dropped fierce criticism in the direction of the government for bringing the latter against citizens and businesses in the time of pandemic. Through a Facebook post, Ahmeti has said that the government at this time has two primary tasks, which are the return of trust to [...]
Pristina Mayor Shpend Ahmeti has once again dropped fierce criticism in the direction of the government for bringing the latter against citizens and businesses in the time of pandemic.
Through a Facebook post, Ahmeti has said that the government at this time has two primary tasks, which are the return of confidence in the economy and the protection of citizens so they do not fall into the poverty line.
A government at this time just as a government didn't think. So the state has to put itself in business and citizen shoes. Under what terms would a business invest today, and under what citizen conditions would spend more. But when you think of it, you will know what you are saying, and it is not a solution. Keynes' solution to aggregate demand has nothing to do with me finding exactly 900 euros in loans to buy me that we are fighting, but with the return of confidence to the economy to save more “, he wrote.
He has even said that the government should do what its municipality is doing, but the same actions should multiply for 100.
Full Posting:
Bislo, you missed his brother again that I'm not even expecting from the government!
In this crisis, the government has two goals. With trust in the economy turned around where businesses invest citizens spend (opposite contraction) so to speak of the discomfort that black days are waiting for us and 2. When you defend the most endangered, don't fall under the poverty line.
A government at this time only as a government did not think. So the state has to put itself in business and citizen shoes. Under what terms would a business invest today, and under what citizen conditions would spend more. But when you think of it, you will know what you are saying, and it is not a solution. Keynes' solution to aggregate demand has nothing to do with me finding exactly 900 euros in loans to buy me that we are fighting, but with the return of confidence to the economy to save more.
Government investments are zero because you have them, businesses can't afford to invest that they're not expecting anything, and citizens don't spend that they don't. Those with them are preserved for black days. The opposite of Keynes!
The government must produce what Pristina is doing multiplied by 100. Grants for businesses, capital investments in the max, and distribution of money for all sectors. Citizens would spend more than they would have, businesses would invest beyond grants because they expect better days and capital investments would be directly increasing aggregate demand without going to consumption of imports.
It's simple, in Macro 101 at any school. Left and right. It's in every serious state in the world today. We only have the will of mind.
I'm hoping that this part that I read in the media that you said “all those who need aggregate demand are able to get a loan..... ..8x1> is a miscretion because for the first time in life I'm hearing that aggregate demand is someone's individual need.
Don't write me status, you get into debate. It's easy, we just want to.
P.S. In countries with monetary policy, the share of banks is influenced by the interest that central banks lend to commercial banks by directly affecting interest. Since we don't have monetary policy then intervention could be more direct. Whether with flat interest rates in emergency stage or through a government loan fund for banks on the condition of extremely low interest rates. But even this has no effect without other measures
