Yasharaj to Periscope: The judge then decides under the influence of emotion or politics, we'll take this job to the end.

Jasharaj has said the judge/ja seems to have made that decision by being influenced by emotions or politics.

He has said that they will file complaints against the Court's decision and that they will bring the case to the end.

I don't know what to say anymore. If this is happening, then SBASKU will see what the court is based on. We consider that the judge or the judge has made that decision by being influenced by emotions, or influenced by politics. I don't know what it's based on, because the Court has had to bring a positive verdict on us, since we've studied the Greece Law well and he doesn't owe us to compensate for the lost hours. We will immediately file a complaint and send him to the Court of Appeals because we consider that the Court that ruled in favour of STAT) has thus ruled by the emotions that they were losing their hours, or was influenced by politics. The court has to tell whether the minister's decision was based on law, right? If the judge is made with emotions, it is wrong because decisions should be handled by facts and arguments. The court had to make a decision whether we or August are right. If Augusta has brought a decision that is not based on law, then the court has had to say that. If the court has decided that, we will fight until the end of”, Jasharaj said about Periscope.

In addition, he has said it is wrong for the Court to be based on the Law on Pre-university Education when making such a decision, as it rules the issue of strikes.

The University Education Law defines the responsibilities and responsibilities it has in organising education and is their right. No one has said that the situation is normal and regular in the education system during the three-week strike, but I'm saying that the Greece Law, voted by the Parliament, stipulates that the strike is a legitimate decision, and that it says hours should be held after the strike. If that happens, then the strike loses value. Because the state cares about the Union's demands, because they know that hours are compensated for after the strike ends. We will work out the complaint, and our position remains that we observe the hours until we have the final verdict from the” courts, Jasharaj said further. Periscope.

The Foundation Court in Pristina, the Department for Administrative Affairs, has rejected the lawsuit of the United Education, Science and Culture Union (SBASHK) as groundbreaking for replacing hours lost in the strike case. In the act of this court, which has provided “Justice Vow”, it is said that the August decision is fair and legitimate and that compensation of lost hours in the strike is aimed at educational development of students and their social and professional skills.

That, according to them, is in line with the general principles of pre-university education laid down with the Law on Pre-university Education. This act was taken by Judge Arjeta Sadiku, where the verdict is said to be MANT is not discriminated against, nor punishable for the plaintiff, nor is it a teacher who is in charge of this decision, reports the “Justice Act for”.

The indictment in this case was exercised after August 27th, 2019, had made a decision to replace lost hours due to the temporary break of teaching in pre-public education institutions as a result of the strike. The August decision said that lost hours would be replaced five days during spring break, five days during the school year, and in five days replaced after the end of the school year.

But against that ruling there was the SBASK, where, through the indictment exercised in court on March 4, 2019, he had sought to annul this decision, claiming it was illegal. Despite the indictment party's claims, the court has put in place the agreed verdict, with the argument that the same is based on the Law for Pre-university Education, and that August is largely responsible for standards planning and ensuring quality in the pre-university education system.

“To decide, the court was initially based on the Pre-university Education Law, which at Article 5 defines the ministry's tasks, meaning the August indictee, which according to this provision the Ministry bears the main responsibility for planning, setting standards and securing the quality of the pre-university education system”, is said among other things in the indictment.

It says that the act is also based on Administrative Guide for the School Year Calendar, with which the required days and weeks of teaching are determined, in which the August tasked with implementing the educational staff's schedule when the teacher is absent by or without reason, and the purpose of paying off lost hours is to realise the pre-plan for the school year. Moreover, it says that in the inability of compensation for unmet hours, the teacher is obliged to find the proper form for the implementation of the respective learning objectives. According to the court, this implies that the compensation of the hours is the responsibility of the teacher himself, which in the concrete case with the ignorance's decision has been determined the form of compensation of lost hours.

“Mbi this base, the court estimates that the indictment-hit indictee's decision is a fair and legal one, because the same has been taken after proving all relevant facts, confirming the legal provisions in force” is said in this case. Otherwise, according to the indictment exercised on March 4th, 2019, the United Education, Science and Culture Union (SBASHK) has called for the annulment of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology's decision (MASHT) to replace hours lost in the strike case. This was after the SBASK decision of January 10th, 2019, all educational institutions in Kosovo had been on strike from January 14th, demanding increased wage cofficiency under the Law for Salaries. Linked to lost hours to strike, August, February 27, 2019, had ruled on replacing hours lost in the strike, where, according to this decision, lost hours will be replaced five days during spring break, five days during the school year and in five days replaced after the end of the school year.

But with such a decision, the SBASK did not agree, as according to this union, this decision had been contrary to the Law on Gravas and the Kolektive Education Treaty in Kosovo. Disgusted with this decision, the SBASK had exercised indictments, with what cases it sought from the Constitutional Court in Pristina, the Department for Administrative Affairs, annulment of this decision.