7 hours agoWhite House reasons decision to interrupt Trump-Kim meeting
Periskopi(7 years ago)
(7 years ago)The White House on Sunday defended the break of President Donald Trump's high-level meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Hanoi, saying that by refusing a partial agreement under the conditions of jinn, American interests were protected. National Security Adviser John Bolton told CBS television that “the question was [...]
National Security Adviser John Bolton told CBS television that “the question was whether North Korea was willing to accept what the president calls the great agreement, which is total disleariism, according to a formulation that the president handed over to Kim Jong Unit and create the possibility of a developed economic future, or something less than that for us that was unacceptable”.
Mr. Bolton added that President “stood firmly in his view”, that he deepened his relationship with Kim Jong Uni and that he did not consider failure when national interests are protected.
In one of the morning interviews he gave for CNN, Mr. Bolton said if you don't get a good deal, you better have no deal at all than a bad deal”. National Security Adviser said the fate of further negotiations with North Korea is not clear. /voa/
