“Nenad Rassic has violated the legal deadline for complaint at Supreme”

That is how law connoisseur Jevdet Smakqi, who has said this is confirmed in preambles of complaint, has been used under Article 26. paragraph 7 of Law for Court No.06/L-054.

“On the basis of legal call in the prembulas of the key “Ancese” Nenad Rassic has not been able to practice annexes, but any extraordinary means since he has lost the legal deadline because this article refers to formal form judgments.

But it's strange how Rassic regarded these votes as forged by the Serbian List to ask the Supreme for the count of these votes.

His complete scripture:

Attention:
This fact proves that “anques are used under Article 26. Paragraph 1 and 7 of the Law For Court Law No.06/L-054.

Article 26 paragraph 1.1 to 7 predicts the competency of the Supreme Court for placing extraordinary means see Article in the picture.

Based on the legal call to the preamble of the key “anquerque” Nenad Rassic has not been able to practice annexes, but any extraordinary means since he has lost the legal deadline, because this article refers to acts of formal form.

Would the fundamental question for the Supreme Court have delivered within the legal deadline the regular tool that is Ankesen Nenad Rassic?

If not, then the Supreme Court will have to throw it away as indefinitely.

Even when the Serbian List party, which has 100% of the cancelled votes, has not complained, and another rival party has no vote in that group legally cancelled by PZAP.

NISMA AKR DP in the Assembly points.