The fake “Veterians ~x1> tomorrow they appear for the first time before the Court

Tomorrow at 10:00 at the Pristina Foundation Court, the first session of the indictment for the growth of lists with the false <x0vetane” since the indictment was established. Former heads of the Government Commission for the recognition and Verification of the Status of Veterans are expected to be formally recognised on [...] charges this Monday.
Tomorrow at 10:00 at the Pristina Foundation Court, the first session of the indictment for the growth of lists with the false <x0vetane” since the indictment was established.
Former heads of the Government Commission for the recognition and Verification of the Veterans' Status are expected to be formally recognised this Monday on charges Kosovo Special Prosecutorship charges in the well-known veterans' case broadcast Koha.net.
Agim Ceku, Nuredin Lushtaku, Sadik Halitaj, Shumbin Demalijaj, Qele Gashi, Shukri Buja, Ahmet Daku, Rrustem Berisha, Faik Fazliu, Smajl Elezaj, Xhavhi's Fadil Shudray, is expected to sit at the bank of the accused at the beginning of the week.
But in this initial examination, obstacles are expected.
He's Shumbin Demalijaj's lawyer, Arian Koci, who says that, in addition to the invitation, his client has not yet accepted an act of improvement.
KTV has contacted the other indictees of this case, but most of them, over the phone, have told KTV they have accepted invitations and also the act of improvement.
While, Pristina Foundation Court spokeswoman Mirlinda Gashi, has short confirmed that this court has sent all the parties invitations and also the amended indictment, so, as Gashi has said, the session is expected to be held as it was before on January 28th.
In September of last year, the Special Prosecutors filed charges against 12 former members of the Government Commission for recognising the Status of KLA Veterans. Special Prosecution accuses them of misusing official position or authority”.
However, the court had returned this special prosecutor's indictment for improvement and clarification with the argument that the device of the indictment, in the actual part of the criminal record, was confused and thus prevented the possibility of fair prosecution without procrastination and numerous obstacles in the process. /Periscopi












