Vetevendosje in Skenderaj vs Bekim Jashar: These are 19 violations

The Vetevendosje movement in Skenderaj has sent media a list of audience findings with violations in this municipality.

According to Vetevendosje, these are the audience's findings: “Communa does not have any particular software for managing cashable inflows/countries, accounts are managed at Excel, which does not provide full security for data (can be changed and do not remain a trace). Without reek, subsidies were provided in two cases. The demand for making the decision on subsidies on behalf of clubs was submitted by the director of the mayor's Culture Directorate, which suggests the director himself received these tools. Information revealed in the Annual Financial Mirrors about wealth is not accurate. The SIMFK property registry is overestimated with registered richs who were badly planned/budgetuire for the value of 32.495”.

In addition, always according to Vetevendosje there has been <x0 violation in teaching recruiting procedures”

“In the class/ substitute class learning/replacement competition, no writing test procedures have been followed. The candidate selection was made only on the basis of the interview. The teaching competition for physical education was only a written test, not even interviews, and no higher candidate had been selected. For English-language teachers at the school in Krasaliq, there has been no competition for that position. A candidate was selected for the announced competition in Polac. The municipality during 2017 engaged eight (8) employees/staf with arrangements for special services ( MShV. The commitment of three of them was done without applying the public competition procedures, but only at the request of relevant Municipal Directors” has the VV written on the media report.

<x0bbbubs in procurement procedures” have been investigated.

<x) The supply of wood for heating we have estimated that the acceptance of goods was made by only one person (submissioned evidence)”.

Furthermore, the VV has counted the findings in “overpassing payments to Framework contracts. “The law envisions that the frame contract can be exceeded by 30 percent, there are cases where it is exceeded 50 percent. None of the bills received/paid has been protocoled, since the municipality has no protocol book on the identity of accepted bills. In three cases the directors of the directors had been appointed contract managers while they were also the owner of payments, this phenomenon contrary to legal requirements in the division of tasks. We have encountered cases that public/local business space user had never paid the monthly rent since 2015, which by the end of 2017 had an accumulated debt to the municipality worth 4,785 $”, says Vetevendosje's announcement.

According to this party, the audience has cited them as 19 legal violations, but within each violation there are three more violations.

Could they do something more? Hide, falsification, no public competitions, non-competitive subsidies, violations of procedures, no protocol book, no choice of merit candidates in education, contract manager, but also authorised for paying that contract, misuse of public property etc.”, has said this party at the end of the media communiqué.