Reagon Pacolli: I don't drink schupps, prosecution investigate who abused my name

Deputy Prime Minister Behgjet Pacolli for only 1 month had ordered 344 drinks of the type -- Schweppes. Of them, 182 had been tonics, and 162 different caribou. These schweppes have been paid by the state wallet in October 2011. He has denied Pacolli himself, saying that he does not consume soda.

According to Pacolli, information published in the media is incorrect and someone may have abused his name.

I don't know when the last time I've had soft drinks, I never consume them! I paid cash or signed the bill. As a rule, any consumption on my part, it should have my signature -- something like that I'm doing even when it comes to accounts that don't have to do with the third party. That means, if there's no evidence signed by me, it's not mine Categorically! If it's like this -- like the media type -- then someone abused in my name, writes Pacolli on Facebook:

Pacolli's complete Facebook entry:

The prosecutor must investigate immediately!

I'm on my way back from the official trip to Thailand and I'm reading in some media as if I've personally spent hundreds of my coffee and house euros every month!

In respect of public opinion, I mean with moral and criminal responsibility, I inform you that this cannot be true!

This kind of campaign looks like wine soap operas, but I have no desire and there is no basis for me being in their center.

First of all, never in my mandate, I have not consumed on behalf of the state -- unless there were any official delegations, but these were very few.

I invited most of my guests to my home, at my own expense, and at much other costs, I paid them out of my own pocket. I didn't get any pay; I didn't hire and spend hotels; and I paid most of my official travel tickets too; I didn't have an official car, and I didn't consume any gasoline, for the whole time I was in government. Every amount I've consumed in the prime minister's room I paid from my own pocket. For information, for the curious detail, I consume a special coffee that requires a special car. And I had this last one in my office (even now), and when I wanted to, I used it.

Second of all, I don't know when last time I've had a soft drink, and so on, I never consume it! I paid cash or signed the bill. As a rule, any consumption on my part, it should have my signature -- something like that I'm doing even when it comes to accounts that don't have to do with the third party. That means, if there's no evidence signed by me, it's not mine Categorically!

If it's like this -- as the media write -- then someone abused me.

I invite the prosecutor to open this case immediately and investigate it thoroughly. I'm available.

It's a shame what I'm accused of!