Editorial ï Thaci's Kukat, Kurti's silence, Kosovo partition

Political events in Kosovo occur in the form of words [or silence]. In the form of statements. Basically, events or political events are the case when we hear a new sentence, or when a often heard sentence is contradicted by another, or when it is repeated. Or even when a sentence expected to be heard is finally heard.

But political events do not constitute a sentence or a Kosovo politician's statement. Even the president. Because their word is inconsistent, deprecious, inconsistent. It doesn't translate into any difference. People call this kind of word that doesn't make up the event a dick.

Suppose, Hashim Thaci had declared that Kosovo would be removed visas seven years ago. Then, Ramush Haradinaj had said that Murat Meha's demarcation should not be ratified and ratified by himself. The main slogan of Movement led by Albin Kurti had been “not negotiations”, but the one in 2014 wanted to become foreign affairs minister to negotiate with Serbia. These are some of the stupid, insignificant bullshit.

However, some important events in Kosovo took place these days. The European Commission gave positive recommendation for abolishing visas. So we have fulfilled the remaining criteria - fighting corruption and organised crime. We know that corruption and organised crime in the country are flourishing and prospering as ever, but we know that this was criteria to say, and that visas are likely to be removed.

Another event of great importance is the silence of the US ambassador to Pristina, Delawi, in the question of whether there was a possibility for territorial exchange or partition of Kosovo. The American stance at this point seems to have wavered.

Opposition parties seem snooped at their inconsistencies. One, another, seems to have no new words to say. What do you say, and more importantly, huh? It would represent significant political events if these parties were to change course by overthrowing the government through the Serb List, or otherwise, they would become part of a team of unity for the dialogue issue. It is not because both of them suffer their rhetorical infertility of the past.

As opposition slumber continues on one side, and stuttering type [ Kosovo - EU family] on the other side of people of institutions, Kosovo turns out to risk being divided territorially. The VV suffers that it does not know how to legitimise before the electorate a coalition in the future with the PDK, while the LDK suffers because it does not know how to establish power in the Chinese-democratic Kosovo by taking the role of the party of Wessel.

No one comes to say that dialogue in question is not a purely local issue, which would affect only Kosovo and Serbia. No one had the courage to remove the liberation as events produced by the KLA. People who came to power after 2008, and who were even earlier powerful in the discours that placed emphasis on that political and military formation, prevented the pragmony that showed that Kosovo had not been released on its own. And the international intervention that produced liberation continues to shape important political events that come in the form of words from international diplomats. Do you think Kosovo would enter the negotiator procession in 2011 if the KLA had gained its release in 1999? But, indiscriminately, all political parties try to slip into history to show where all these international conditions come from.

For a decade now, Russian aggression has increased against Western countries. At the media conference after the Helsinki summit, US President Trump came to the side of Russian President Putin and practically legitimised him for his country's aggression. Russia had annexed the Crime in 2014, and it was not even tired of justifying that action. This is the one everyone fears a legal aggression. Russia's legislation is highly arbitrary, and in the case of Crime, he had mentioned the intervention he had made NATO in Kosovo.

Here's what Putin had said when he was asked by the Bild newspaper about the crime case: “What about international law?”

Of course, we must always follow international law. This is about Crime. According to the chapter of the Bahskuar Nations, each person has the right to self-rule. Take Kosovo: then, UN troops decided that Kosovo would become independent from Serbia and that the interest of the government of Serbia should go away. You can also read that in German. ”

Therefore, in order to legitimise the NATO intervention in Kosovo, Serbia must formally recognise our unilaterally proclaimed Republic!

The dialogue launched in 2011 was another important political event. But the political scene in Kosovo became deaf and mute to it. Thaci lied that we were not negotiating only technical issues, not political ones. In his lie, other parties were introduced besides Vetevendosje which, however, decided to forge an even bigger lie: we had no need to negotiate with Belgrade. This stance was consistent with protests against the Ahtisaari Pack that defeated Kosovo's independence and, with opposition to the Ramboullet Agreement, the text which prompted NATO to begin shelling Serbia.

However, it was Thaci who failed to build a political consensus on the issue and accept painful truths at mealtime. It was the head.

He was delegated both outside Kosovo and inside. His word became so weightless that Hoyt Brian Yee had exposed him a week after saying that “The US supported Kosovo to form the army without constitutional changes”. We're not mentioning the many scandals in government here, and the dawning of power methodology through the Pronto Aphery.

Furthermore, Thaci has such a poor speaker and support from political parties, which are practically counted as customer and abusers, and fail to legitimise any action they do.

In a conversation with several students, Thaci today said: “Kosovo must continue internal dialogue.” What dialogue is he talking about? No internal dialogue on the agreement with Serbia is taking place in the country. Government on one side, and opposition in the other make useless monologues. One, meanwhile, [excussively for Kosovo] is occurring in Serbia. President Aleksandar Vuciq, months ago, had written a bold letter saying that “should give up the myths for Kosovo and accept a painful solution”. In contrast to Thaci, Vuciqi has been dealing with the Serbian public for a long time and is giving them the idea that recognising Kosovo, by taking something at the expense of the latter, is the obligation if the country wants to enter the EU. According to all likelihood, we will also have a referendum on the issue in Serbia. This would be the first time Serbia would accept an international agreement on Kosovo, and if Kosovo did not succeed in accepting international support, it would definitely fall fearfully, and Kosovo's status would be opened for negotiation.

As stated repeatedly, the deal is expected to be painful for the country. That should be the necessary alarm for the opposition to wake up from political slumber. To prevent the possibility of territorial division, which could indeed cause political events to shape us, not in word form, but in the form of shooting and slandering.