Kurti: Dialogue with Serbia to become balance, debate in Parliament

Kurti has declared it necessary to become the balance of dialogue 2011-2018, report to the Assembly and become a parliamentary debate.

According to him, there have been many investments, few returns and little transparency in this process.

“33 agreements have been signed in the six-year dialogue, most of them have not in particular been realised should mention the deadlock Kosovo was made in the field of electricity, at the bridge in Mitrovica, in integrations and in recognition of diplomas”, Kurti said.

He has also said there are some points that need to be settled and that have to do with dialogue.

“to implement internal and democratic dialogue. Debate in the country for dialogue, for purpose and format. The dialogue, which took place in 2011-2017, was dialogue under Serbia's conditions, was discussed on Kosovo's domestic issues, without considering Serbia as indebted to Kosovo and secessions. Internal dialogue should be developed with different social categories and interest groups down. For example, with family associations of the unknown, former political prisoners, Kosovo mayors and others. The safety of the process should also be established early on. Develop a dialogue with the EU on dialogue with Serbia. The nature, purpose, and content of that dialogue. It can't go on with the double, so it has at least three different meanings. The process itself was sometimes also called technical and political dialogue, at times negotiations, and even negotiations. Expressions and goals as well as Kosovo's benefits in the Euro-Atlantic process need to be clarified. Preliminary dialogue with the European Union is also needed for the EU itself, which has expressed renewed interest in the integration of the Western Balkans. We agree that there will be no deviation in Kosovo from the priority of employment and justice, as well as dialogue with Kosovo Serbs and other development minorities. During dialogue 2011-2017, Kosovo's state agenda has been kidnapped by diplomacy of permanent normalisation talks. Fighting corruption and crime all others have been put aside along the development of this dialogue. Under these circumstances, this compliance cannot include the name of Hashim Thaci and Edita Tahiri. The man who in dialogue with Serbia did not raise the issue of the unconscious, the division of Mitrovica, the exploitation of Trepca, the Kosovo property that is across Yugoslavia, the man who for six years turned down Serbia's crime -- the man who fears too much of the establishment of the special act, the man who supported Zajednica and Asociation, who holds the main responsibility for failure to membership in the U. NESTO, this man cannot guide the dialogue. The fourth plan” is necessary, Kurt said.