Editor The EU does not eat dicks for us

The progress report is more formal and technical than real and container. Scanning Kosovo's situation is too superficial to be taken seriously. The interpretation of what happened in Kosovo in 2017 is narrow and unmeaning. For example, the ratification of demarcation with Montenegro is estimated, the use of tear gas is criticised [...]
The progress report is more formal and technical than real and container. Scanning Kosovo's situation is too superficial to be taken seriously. The interpretation of what happened in Kosovo in 2017 is narrow and unmeaning. For example, the ratification of demarcation with Montenegro is estimated, the use of tear gas is criticised, polarisations in politics are criticised, and superficial estimates are given for the work of many institutions.
The report's own sentences are copies of previous reports, which show that Kosovo has not noted progress, but also that the EU, to be bluntly said, does not for Kosovo. There are more important jobs and much bigger problems. It's a risk of dissolving, and there are so many divisions, which French President Macro called the “similar to civil war” yesterday.
The EU itself established the Liberal Internationalism project in Kosovo. It established the political-economic system that generates corruption. He designed our flag, composed the anthem [called Europe], designed every article of the constitution, and left Kosovo society completely unrepresented. Nothing conveys the spirit of this society, however primitive or rude. And everything conveys the spirit of the EU. This makes our society feel totally frustrated in its state, in institutions that should serve it in the false symbol of representation. The very existence of society, with its authentic values, constitutes an act of corruption.
On page 26 of the Progress Report for 2017, political parties reportedly respect gender quotas and currently there are 39 female deputies in a 120-member assembly. But it is acknowledged that gender quotas have had no efficiency in increasing women's voter turnout. And indeed, the representation of women in political life has not influenced the number of women in employment, nor has the number of women increased in public life and nothing. Because the spirit of this society is suppressed. All of us are simply and only the figures that are moved by the recommendations of these reports that say nothing.
The interpretation of liberal values is monopolized by the EU. So we have a monopoly of everything called European, even if this interpretation is superficial and often double standards.
There is no need to declare anti-Europeans when we say the EU has done great injustice to Kosovo citizens. We might mention some. First, it is visa non-liberalisation that was translated into a terrible isolation for us. The only ones in Europe. Like we were wild. Later, we had the obligation to launch a new set of negotiations on Kosovo's status in 2011, though we had declared independence in 2008. The EU, it failed to speak in a voice to Kosovo, as it tolerated five of its countries not to recognise independence. Let's not talk about Euex, who failed badly.
The EU makes the interpretation of progress, and liberal values, on its strategic interests. And so Mogher's statements in Kosovo are always boring and repetitive, as are progress reports, always boring and repetitive.
Returning the report: Kosovo's main problem is said to be sustainability. Kosovo walks into implementing or implementing its laws. Suppose, of course, that there is the required formalities but not the durability, its content, its function. And the blame for this is practically not laid on anyone in particular and on each of us in general. This too is hypocrisy. Or just ignore it.
There are practically only two politicians in Kosovo, besides the EU career repeaters: Kurt and American Ambassador Delaway. The others are businessmen in real life, and political figures embracing the legalisation of reports and commandments of Ambassador Delawi. And who leave, completely silent, unrepresented, Kosovo society. While Kurti has completely occupied the scope for criticism, and it is not surprising, his discours also become liquefy between a transformation to the EU's performance monopoly, and the opposite, its non-conformation to it.
Kosovo citizens do not want Kosovo. Because they do not feel represented in it. Yesterday, Periscop translated a script. “National Identity and Political Power” by Andreas Wimmer, who writes that political representation rather than geographical demographic, or homogenity within a country, affects the sense of patriotism. Better illustration than Kosovo for its idea does not.
The fight against corruption should start from here. The fight against any bad phenomena should be initiated by citizens of the Republic of Kosovo.