Editor Why Power Does Not Want Educated Society

However, school infrastructure has improved in a measure. Also, the salaries of teachers and university professors have increased. But this has not raised the quality at all.

Periscope, about two months ago, has done an analysis of August's administrative guidelines, indicating that the tendency they set out is not the quality in education but the further reinforcement of clientilism. This is link to those who want to read it: https://periscope.com/analyze-tensence-e-mish-no-cilesia-ne-education-but-forforce-clitelism/

Of course, the clientelemism installed by the ruling political parties has a specific operating scheme outlined. There is a top, from which the members of the clientle are later drawn. It is harsh with credit or competence, since obedience and the service of power are the main asset. This top contains uneducated people, attributes that affect shaping all clientele. So this type of attribute: being uneducated may seem bad to ordinary citizens, media, television, but not to other members of the clientele. Anyone who has had the chance to get acquainted with any member of this clientele organized by the ruling parties observes the sympathy and kindness that these people feel for those with education and lame education.

The logic of people who serve this clientele in one way or another is not even close to the important people on Facebook where the uneducated ʹ is generally viewed as a member of the state's capture.

This clientele also sharply dictates the annual remains of the Ministry in improving quality. To illustrate, we can say that this is a certain alliance of angels to make sure other classroom students learn and engage and make noise, mess, and make the whole class remain.

Translated rudely on our political ground, it can be said: since Ramush Haradinaj, Kadri Veselin or Hashim Thaci are uneducated, and since they are at the top, unconsciously want the entire society to be educated. Maybe one of them really wants the education situation to really improve, but one of them might well ask: why have they never troubled the matter?

And obviously, this type of clientelelymism that exists in Kosovo depends greatly on the bad situation in education. An educated man who makes high demands on himself, who believes that with his hard work he can achieve something, and who protects dignity, he does not become part of the clientele. Not at the top, not anywhere. It's not that simple, of course. In a lack of perspective, even educated people break and submit. But if the mass of educated people is so large, then the network of clientelelysmism that works through education would risk disarray.

Yet, that goes deeper than that. Such clientelism is built precisely by our cultural and educational circumstances. It's an organization that bases itself on them, and it works through them. So all of our society has remained ongoing in these two decades despite the myth that it was education and that it was not allowed by the invaders to have its own school. Having the school in her hands, popular with irony, she made him a '%namine.

Furthermore, the family has a greater role in educating and filling the values of young Kosovars than the school itself. There is a silent resistance to the whole day's lesson, which would connect the Kosovo student more to school than to his home. It would make a more social creature, more engaged in community, and dull the still-family character of his and our society. It's quite disturbing that a large part, perhaps 80% of young people 18-32, still live with their parents. Although there is no measurement on the matter.

It is disturbing that Kosovo students' 2/3 do not understand what they read. But not for their inability or teacher inadequacy or even the inability of August. This is disturbing to our culture, which is still in resistance to school and experiences it simply as a protruding mechanism but not as a formative mechanism.

“School doesn't make you human; it says a popular expression. This expression was broken out clearly demonstrated by the electronic rigidity that makes human conception and its connection to the disciplinary mechanisms of family and society. It literally means family and non-institute parts of society to meet with value and education that leads to the “building of the man”. According to this social optical “the man” if there is no organicity as good or bad, is built by family or society, but not by the institution of society to do it: school.

Today is teacher day in Albanian - speaking countries. But the way the teacher experiences some conservativeism to progress and knowledge: the teacher should be either a national asset, or a patriot; or a promoter in the world, where the student gets a good place in social scheme from the help received by that good teacher [and the bad teacher is the one who doesn't care about him in this respect]; but not as a dangerous manager, who opposes values, and invites students to see with critical minds even those who are taught at home and on the streets.

What if the establishment of the quality of education destroys the man canned by the Kosovo Albanian families, seriously affects the values they believe in, questions history, suffering, and all that they are taught by the family? Well, that's an inevitable consequence. And among the first signs of this quality's eventual growth, it would not be the ranking of the PISA [of which a large number of intellectuals have expressed serious remarks], but that's exactly what a huge conflict of values.